To put it bluntly, "Jane Eyre" is a Cinderella story mixed with Gothic style and feminist meaning. The original works are all good-looking, and the point of art is: the thing that has to be said between a tough Cinderella who has grown up like a weed and a prince who has been wounded and awaiting spiritual salvation. To put it bluntly, according to today's words, it is a concentrated expression of various dog-blood plots: the heroine has both parents dead, left behind, in a humble situation, unique temperament, and outstanding personality; the hero has an authoritarian father, money marriage, and terrible big Wife, trained with a more flexible black-belly Scorpio masculine temperament; the hostess stays in the male host’s house, confronts each other day and night, bickering, and touching small eyes; the male host’s secret conspiracy is exposed, there is an accident at the wedding, the female host runs away from home, and is caught People are rescued, come to make a fortune, recognize their ancestors and return to their ancestors; the hero’s house burns, the eldest wife is dead, and the lover finally gets married! (Aunt Qiongyao, modern small words, and vomiting dramas are all willing to bow down.)
Although the plot is terrible, it is called success when written in that era, and the description of the scene is beautiful, the personality is vivid, and the bridge is wonderful. , The exquisite dialogue design is absolutely high.
I don’t have a problem with flashbacks in this version of the movie, but for a two-hour-long movie, why can’t I give more time to the classic lines? The first time I met "Mohammed" was deleted for me. Are you afraid that the audience can't understand it? Although the two have a lot of small eyes, they still feel that if they are more comfortable with the lines of the 1996 version of the script, they will actually move more of the original words of Aunt Bronte, which saves effort and pleases. This version of the screenwriter either treats the audience as mentally handicapped, or is too expressive, and has to make the dialogue plain and popular.
I don't like the protagonist very much in the 96 version, but it is indeed a very warm version of Jane Eyre. Especially the confession of the two people, it is natural and beautiful. This version of Jane Eyre’s confession is very cynical. It seems that Mr. Luo is not her unfavorable person, but is vile and owes her a car. Money rascals are average, and there is less sadness and deep emotion. And many good-looking sections have been deleted. For example, Mr. Luo who has a dark belly wants to send Miss Jane "to Ireland", Miss Jane replied affectionately and depressively, "It's too far" or something, and half-confession-style "I wish I I've never been born before, I hope I never come to Thornfield..."
Also, since it's a movie, we can't be as comprehensive as a TV series, right? Cousin, don’t take up too much space? No one wants to see my cousin, we want to see Jane and Eyre arguing. Little girl Adela is also a bit robbing the scene, so it's better to share it with Miss Ingram. It's best to watch the jealous scene.
Finally, I complained that the ending was too quiet. Jane Eyre used his cousin to make Mr. Luo jealous and deleted this wonderful scene without leaving it, and Rochester's "I'm not as good as a dead tree" is so distressing words, Jane Love’s wonderful answer: "Whether you want it or not, flowers and plants will grow around your roots, because they like your shade." Why are you embarrassed to swallow the screenwriter? Also, Rochester's hair can be messed up like a dead tree, and the beard can be stubborn, but don't you want to make a big beard? I went to Robinson or something.
In fact, if you have enough time, the final ending of the 007 male main version in 1983 is very meticulous. Rochester's humble heart and the small anger of related products are very distressing, and the little jealousy of his cousin is also extremely cute, with his strong figure. , The fortitude of the face contrasts well and has a dramatic effect. The 06 version also has plenty of time, but unfortunately, Mr. Luo's ending has changed from the original ruthless man to a wronged child, but the design that Jane threw him to the ground is quite interesting.
Others are good, the scene modeling is good, the senses are pleasing to the eye, the classic British style will like it, the photography is also good, the light and shadow are emphasized, the characters are also set a lot of small movements, the small eyes increase the sense of ambiguity, Rochester gives the little girl hair Don't flower a little orchid so touching.
Some people say that this version of Lao Luo is a bit evil, well, men are not bad and women don't love. The saintly innocent Jane girl has a playful expression on Scorpio Lao Luo, which is worth seeing.
There is also a scene where a little girl sees Lao Luo without trousers and is shy. It has a sense of sexual enlightenment. In fact, this is also the ideal male image in Bronte's mind, full of masculinity and experience. Certain aspects have a certain guiding effect on women. Of course, Bronte also pursues the reciprocity of emotions between men and women, so it is inevitable that the male protagonist will be redeemed by the female protagonist in the end. Although I am also a woman, I can only say that women are really contradictory. Just as the animal that led the resistance against the farmer was the most oppressive animal, I think the most feminist women may be the weakest women in need of love.
View more about Jane Eyre reviews
