I wanted to give a one-star rating, but since I watched Director Liming's "Get Red" before, the one-star honor should be dedicated to Director Li.
The story of King Arthur is said to have happened in the fifth century AD, when English was not yet formed or just produced, so the story of King Arthur was handed down orally and can be called a legend. In short, his story is full of legends. However, the director of the film was obviously dissatisfied with the legendary nature of the story, so he insisted on inventing some more fantastical things by himself. As a result, he picked up sesame seeds and lost the watermelon. Archmage Merlin never showed up, but a prostitute adoptive mother and a beautiful mage appeared. It's not that a movie can't be made without beautiful women. It seems that the director knows that his unique storytelling style is not popular, so he finds a PL actress to make up for it. Making up a Chinese person to teach King Arthur Kung Fu is really open-minded, thinking that this will make a good box office in China, it is really disgusting to tell the story like this.
Also, the movie was really unlucky, being translated by a shitty subtitle group made you want to smash your computer.
View more about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword reviews
