After reading various film reviews, how should I put it, some people say that he is vulgar and ruins the three views, but I think in 1992, in terms of the level of attention to the picture, the tone of the scenery, the transitions and the montage, this is a very artistic film. . So I added one more star to the three. And three stars, in that era, maybe vampire stories were popular, like the millennium Hong Kong zombie movie, and the director had a dream about vampires, and everyone was illogical. And all the logic is that there is only one line, romance. In order for Count Dracula to find that person, even if it's just the same skin but not the same soul, Dracula killed many people including poor Lucy, and making Lucy a concubine will have to reconnect with her. Dracula, in the three views of modern people, is a bitch and has to build a torii. And Mina, who has the memory of her past life and nostalgia for Dracula, also struggled to become a so-called tender slut. Some would say you are the most innocent, and Lucy. But ask yourself, are there few examples of Lucy and Mina in reality? A rich and innocent girl who is full of fantasies about love and sex, can't help but taste the forbidden fruit for the first time. Nothing wrong with that. And Lucy's husband, who drinks Nima wine at a critical moment. And the Doctor, knowing where Dracula was going to kill Lucy that night. All this is just for the plot. The plot is only for the romantic fantasy of love in the director's heart. It is unrealistic, but it does not mean that it does not exist.
All his lines are like recitations...but a lot of the close-ups have an on-camera beauty.
View more about Dracula reviews
