I envy these kids, but I'm worried that I won't be able to go to Harvard even with this father's education....
When the eight-year-old girl was discussing the Bill of Rights, I didn't think I was able to achieve this level of intelligence when I was eight years old. Many things are determined by genetics. When my eight-year-old instructor taught me a two-variable linear equation a day, I might not be able to solve it.
Eight years old in third grade.
A long time ago, I had the urge to educate my children like this. I thought I must be a great educator. Later, I found out that I was a rubbish. This father has no problem with being a tenured professor at a top university. However, fathers and mothers are the products of traditional education. They also have the spirit of independence and freedom of thought, and they do not necessarily have to go up the mountain.
A pure hunter life is happier than an agricultural society. This logic is explained in "A Brief History of Humanity", but at the end of the movie he still raised a few chickens. entered the age of agriculture. Why not go straight to Nike. Adidas era....
The lives of all people in modern society are the same, but the lives of all previous social types are the same. It is not meaningful for them to escape, abandon consumerism? No need to be so extreme, but I always thought that they wanted a revolution, and only revolution can explain it... After all, my father's education was not to survive, to talk about human rights, and to talk about the law, but the purpose was to be very good in society... .
Really naughty. It's cool to hear that they don't know Nike is a shoe. They are different. It was exciting to be different, but at the same time he lost the joy of belonging to modern society. The question of which is more important is basically unsolved. As an ordinary person, accepting the arrangement of the times is the only way.
Innate human rights in order to impose coercion. Power is given by human beings, and it is difficult to understand that one human right controls another "human rights" under the Chinese legal system. Is it political correctness for them to maintain Christianity in the United States? It says don't show your disgust. Except for Christians. I don't really understand either. Do philosophers who study Buddhism worry about whether their ashes have been burned? Movies are good. Hope they have the same knowledge. I also hope to buy a mountain in the future.. ......
This may be just the way of life of the rich, if this way can really promote the development of human civilization. Then I must be excited. But no, you can only study philosophy. Philosophy is about worldview and social ideology. This is actually useless at all, and the relationship with religion is ambiguous. (It should be a superset of religion.) What really drives the progress of human civilization is mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology... This cannot be learned without basic education.
Of course, I didn't deny your value. But in terms of superiority, I think you belong to the force, and they belong to the world.
renew:
"To complete this course, you need to read these books. If you don't finish the final exam, you will fail the course." This is a common sentence pattern used by professors in many Harvard open courses. So their students sleep six hours a day, and they have to read 200 books a year. This is the way universities are taught. This is what the father taught in the movie. As for whether primary school students can teach like this... I'm not sure. The book I use the most in my primary school should be the Xinhua Dictionary.
I can also be regarded as a kind of book lover, but it is limited to children's books, and the upper limit is "Reader" and "Digest". Give me a copy of "Lu Xun's Collected Works" that I can't read at all, and the course selection in the language book is boring, and I don't even want to read the illustrated version of "Water Margin". But the university is different. I enjoyed watching "Wang Xiaobo" with relish, "Lu Xun" was even more excited, and even the "Moonlight on the Lotus Pond" written by Zhu Ziqing in the language book can also experience a thing or two.
This is the natural law of development. There is no long-term practice, and life is not used as a comparison. Where can we find common points and laughs?
In fact, they are all geniuses in the movie. They have good genes, and their father and mother are the products of modern education with high IQ. We can't, not everyone is Einstein, Einstein was a genius, a genetic mutation. Einstein met a friend who was 10 years older than him. This friend gave him many books, covering mathematics, philosophy, and physics. During this period, Einstein first came into contact with the "speed of light" in a book. concept. When he was in middle school, Einstein began to show his talent. He was very good in all subjects, especially mathematics. At the age of 12, he began to prove the Pythagoras theorem. At the age of 15, he had mastered calculus. People are different.
Humans came out of the mountains because of genetic mutations, and every evolution is a long wait for genetic modification. Again, not everyone is Einstein, assuming that humans can really achieve what is shown in the play through some kind of "advanced education": King of Philosophy, Nobel Prize in Physics, then human beings have already completed the transformation from the earth. The achievement of expansion into the solar system. Because every way of life and education is experienced all the time in the world. Did any of them get into Harvard? No, they turned into werewolves. The film is idealistic, outrageously beautiful, and, moreover, offers an educational outcome. Independent spirit, free thought.
But by no means an educational method.
Whoever takes this education as a standard will become a sinner. In humanitarianism, we allow geniuses to become ordinary people, but we do not want ordinary people to become invalids. And the truth is, geniuses are geniuses regardless of their educational setting.
Zheng Yuanjie is an amazing writer. He didn't let his children go to school, and I won't evaluate his achievements. Zheng Yuanjie, a literary master, barely trained an ordinary person, the public, and would only teach a group of illiterate people.
View more about Captain Fantastic reviews
