All the spray points in the movie are concentrated on 1, European and American people play Japanese 2, the plot is messy 3, and the difference from the original is too big 4, out of philosophy, it is not a masterpiece at all.
And I think that there is nothing wrong with the widow sister playing the major. If it is played by another person, it will not be better, it will only be worse. Some people complain about the walking posture. I think if the prosthesis and the brain are perfectly combined, the major will not question himself.
Some people say that the plot is messy, and the reason is the original party. The original party madly thinks that the picture depicts the 95 version of "Ghost in the Shell", and the plot should also be filmed in 1995, but the director used the 95 version of the picture to compare The plot of the easy-to-understand Heroes of Kuze does not appear to be incoherent in the plot, provided that your thinking does not lead you to the 95 version of the puppet master.
I don't want to complain about the big difference from the original. If the live-action version is the same as the original, even the people and society are the same, the setting is the same, and the ideas are the same, then you can just watch the original work, it's the same anyway, why spend money again? Woolen cloth. Some things can exist in animation, but they can't be photographed in the live-action version at all, be it "Montage of Representation of Major's Thought" or "Hundred Ghosts Night Walk" in Innocence, if you think it can be photographed, You can try, no one is stopping you. Just like the animated movie "Red Hot Chili Pepper", there are all kinds of distortions in reality, all kinds of ghosts walking in the night, many people want to adapt that story into a movie, but limited to the technical level, it can only be made into animation, the same is true for attacking the shell, some things Not what you want to have.
The philosophical thinking about the soul and the body in the original work is rarely mentioned in the live-action version. The first reason is that this is a commercial entertainment film. It is meaningless to add some inscrutable Descartes theories. On the contrary, people who are new to it will be confused when they watch it in the cinema. Most of the people who spray this are the original party. They have repeatedly brushed the original book and talked about their thoughts on the original work in the forum. Their disappointment is that, first, they want to see how the director understands it, but the director doesn't mention it. They feel that the director has a different focus than that, squirt! Second, I could have used my own advantages to blow a wave to my companions, but the movie did not give them a chance to compare. Therefore, the anger is not good, and the heart is not the taste.
Personally, I think the movie is still a cyberpunk-oriented work, and the plot is closer to the public. For the original party, if you go for feelings, it is recommended to take a look. If you go to the original book, forget it as soon as possible, so that you don’t stop spraying after reading it.
Tails: Science fiction is not a niche, it is not the superiority of a few people, and it is not for you to show off your skills. Sci-fi is just a style, a form. If you really love it, promote it instead of pretending to show it off.
View more about Ghost in the Shell reviews
