Why is everyone talking about the depth and disappointment of this movie? Doesn't anyone think there's a lot of unreasonable and logical things going on here? A space monkey that pops up aboard an unmanned spaceship kills. How is the strange monkey still alive? How to breathe? Did you get the test done? Suddenly adding this paragraph just to show the cruelty of human space experimental animals? I don't know anyway. And what about Pete sneaking into his original ship and NASA ordering the crew to get rid of him? How is it possible that a large high-tech national enterprise would directly issue such an order? Just because he sneaked in and didn't want him to be part of the trip? Do the same as the underworld boss. And as a scientist, the crew member is also a colleague, just like taking medicine, he directly changes sex and takes a gun to kill him, what the hell? Does killing mean killing? Ordinary criminals wouldn't say that killing is so easy. Those are scientists who carry knives and guns into space? The Japanese crew and the black girl are the same characters as the background wall from the beginning. It's funny that only when you enter, you show your character characteristics. The whole play is like Pitt's self-reported play. It has always been his self-reporting. Others are no different from the background wall. What is the theme of this play? Explore the excessive exploration of human beings to break the balance of the universe? Or explore the loneliness and distortions of human nature in space life? It's just that the father's work has not returned home and disappeared, can the male protagonist's fragile heart be hurt for a lifetime and even affect his character and his life? The tolerance is too bad. What about so many fathers who run away from home or abandon their wives and children in real life? Do kids grow up like this?
View more about Ad Astra reviews
