I have a habit of watching movies. I like to blindly choose themes and pick the actors, and try my best to avoid overly marketed films. Uncle Pete's movie with the name of "Interstellar Exploration" immediately decided to watch it. The consequence of not paying attention before the movie is that the content is often inconsistent with the prediction, and there are often surprises. Never thought that this movie with Star XX is not a sci-fi blockbuster, but a literary film that explores human psychological problems from the perspective of a top astronaut. Students who want to watch sci-fi blockbusters and popcorn movies will definitely be disappointed. . Watching the entire film requires patient listening and thinking. I am not familiar with the director at all, but he used a very simple lens to show that most of the time in the film is in the space of an alien planet, most of which are studio shots. , there is almost no dazzling sense of technology and the future. It should be very controversial to shoot all the alien planets as everyday as going to another place on the earth. Especially when I was 10 minutes late and started watching, I vaguely knew why the protagonist was going to an alien planet, and immediately there were those pictures that didn't seem to have a strong sense of technology. I wondered if it was an old movie, and I immediately searched it on my mobile phone. It's a new movie this year... … After watching it for another 20 minutes, I started to guess again. Maybe it is because aerospace technology has been very developed, so the director wants to make the audience feel that the alien planets in the future era are not so mysterious when making sci-fi films, and shorten the sense of distance. But after watching the movie, it's obviously because this is just a piece of literary and artistic film... The need for funding or the language of the lens, so it is presented like this. The large number of narrations in the film and the constant psychological evaluation of the male protagonist can easily make the audience feel that this is a film that observes and discusses human mental health problems. Using the world's top second-generation astronauts as an entry point case to show, I think it is still very innovative and valuable for sample thinking. The second generation of astronauts, as the top and best human beings, will still be plagued by psychological problems throughout their lives. Dad's generation spent most of their lives in aliens, feeling like they had nothing, and would rather be exiled in aliens than return to Earth. "Why explore? Why insist?" Even if he was found by his own son, he still chose to disappear into the vast universe. The son's generation chose to escape because of the pain in the first half of his life, no longer invested in his feelings, and was lonely for half his life. This closed loop of psychological barriers is something that many people cannot break through in their entire lives. The director allows him to be healed in the process of finding his father and learn to reconcile with himself. "I will live, I will love." There are many bugs in the film, such as research samples attacking astronauts, sneaking into rockets, and accidentally killing other astronauts are too child's play, making the film less refined. The level of the movie can only be three stars, and adding one star really feels that the perspective is still new and has a certain depth. I often wonder if it is because, no matter how the human economy and technology develop and break through, as an individual, the latitude of wisdom and the ability to shape spirituality do not necessarily keep pace with the times. Not the most powerful. From birth, everyone must shape their own inner world from 0, and try to debug their own psychology and spiritual conversion throughout their lives. The emergence of psychology and psychiatrists is indeed a good aid.
It is expected that the box office and reputation of this movie will not be very good, and many people do not like to watch it.
View more about Ad Astra reviews
