I haven't had a chance to see the US version, but the comments are almost one-sided. I don't object to David Fencher's storytelling, but I also heard that the investment of this version is 1.3 million, and the US version is 90 million. It's a bit too far. It's not fair. Saying that Sweden is very developed, why is there so little investment in movies? Is it because the per capita is very rich? Although the per capita in the United States is not too high, but after all, the population is much larger than that of Sweden, plus the gap between the rich and the poor, Hollywood's big money should make sense.
I don’t make a comparison of the gods and horses without seeing the US version. I just mentioned that everyone is talking about the two, and even mentioned the comparison of the original book. In fact, I really want to see how the US version will be different, but Thinking about Hollywood's products are all technical work, relying on dazzling skills will have a large number of people buying it, plus a master storyteller is even more unbearable, this version reminds me not only It's how the movie was made, whether the content of the book is so dark, and all kinds of torture are no longer the subject of my interest, or I go back to the topic that is always mentioned: the book and the movie are creatures of two worlds, Movies are concentrated products, and books are raw materials. Once the raw materials are processed, they will lose some nutrients. Movies focus on the eyeball effect. What it extracts is the adrenaline-rushing bridge from the book, although it does not allow the story and the idea to be conveyed together. , but the book is definitely more valuable than the movie. If a book only talks about erotic killing, it is at most a novel on the Internet. It is the essence of a real book to be thought-provoking. Therefore, no matter how good the film is, I still think the original book is the best. It's king, to be honest, now the movie is just an introduction to the book in my eyes, a glimpse, can't satisfy my curiosity, I'm immune to the so-called big scene, I won't watch it for the big publicity scene, it's a mirror after all In the middle of the flower and the moon, I want to get ideological enlightenment, but watching the movie only seems to be going the wrong way.
In any case, while you are still a little vulgar, you can say it wherever you see it.
I have to admit that this movie is more pornographic and more violent. This is also in terms of Hollywood, which has brought extreme pornography and violence to the extreme. It seems that human nature can only be highlighted by in-depth discussion of very evil and ugly incidents. It always uses violence, sex, Abuse stimulates people's nerves. I want to say that it is normal for people who like to watch the original book. People who like to watch this adapted movie should have too much depression in their hearts. What good things can you learn from here? To put it bluntly, most movies are not noble things, they are created to provide people with an abnormal channel to vent their inner negativity, which will only make people worse, those who worship the aesthetics of violence and so on are not Too normal, talking and talking and talking too far.
What I'm actually resting on is what happened to make these people like that. Don't the girls with dragon tattoos, perverted killers, etc. all had an unusual childhood? Note that I use "ordinary", not "normal", because I understand that most families are not healthy and normal, so they think that families who are quite bt can only be regarded as special, and I have heard of books It is about the social status of women in Sweden. I didn't expect it to be so exaggerated. It also shows that Nazi fanatics are very unhealthy people. The book says that fathers not only attack their daughters but also their sons. It seems that I heard that it was to consider the audience. There is no same-sex picture of receptivity (US version), and the Swedish one doesn't even mention it, happy families are all the same, unhappy in their own way, yes, speaking of the elements that make up society --- family, even if It is to narrow the scope to the very unfortunate category. There are also many cups and cutlery that cannot be used up. People can accept such a heavy mouth and believe that real life is not much better.
I just saw it at the beginning..., what is it called, it is the makeup of the tattooed woman, plus her personality and experience, I can't help but superficially sigh that her existence is to interpret "COOL", and this is the only part of the film. The essence of the original work is basically carried over, of course, suspense or something. It is said that the way of narration and the focus are very different from those in the book. No matter what, a movie is a movie. In addition, I am very surprised that the tattooed women are 24 and need a guardian. What? condition? Thinking of this, I understand again. It turns out that the heroine has a bad record, so she should also be a guarantor, not a guardian, and control income or something. Isn't this worse, it's obviously driving people crazy. Maybe her guardian is not particularly bt, think about the low status of women in that society, and how much better men's attitudes towards women can be. Aren't people uncivilized, and animalistic has the upper hand.
I have no right to speak about the characters in the two versions that are closer to the original, but I have seen the styles of the two tattooed women, and I feel that they are of the same type. The first version is stern, of course, we have to read the specifics. I also heard that the rice version of bt guardian is not very powerful. Also, this version is indeed portrayed quite sanely, which makes people afraid. The tattooed woman met someone like this Yes, it's just that the house dew happens to rain overnight, so sadly urge to go. Others seem to have different roles, so I still look forward to seeing the rice version.
I have said more about the plot, but I haven’t read the original book, so I don’t know exactly how ups and downs the plot is, but just by looking at the appropriately reduced family tree in the film, you can probably know how “epic” it is, but still I'm not interested in books on this subject, and they present the unsatisfactory facts in blood, and I don't think it can bring a good educational effect, there gotta be a better way to do it. For example, forrest gump, "life is like a box of chocolate .you never know what you're gonna get next. "In short, the pictures are fresh, and it's okay to look at the excitement. It's not a good idea to use it as a life inspirational book, isn't it a movie, it's easier to deviate from the intended direction.
So, won't give 4 stars because that's what "recommended" means :P.
View more about The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo reviews
