First of all, let's look at the protagonist: In "The White House Has Fallen", the protagonist and the president have been in friendship for many years. In addition to the sense of responsibility and justice, the protagonist is desperate to rescue the president. In addition to a sense of responsibility and justice, friendship and remorse for his failure to save the president's wife before. Strong sex. The protagonist of this film did not even vote for the president, and his daughter was in deep crisis. In this case, he still has no hesitation to save the president and cause trouble for himself and his daughter. It can only be interpreted as a sense of justice, and the logic of his behavior is a little bit obvious. Weak, but acceptable.
Let's look at a few more villains: The villain of "The White House Has Fallen" is a North Korean terrorist, so he can simply understand all his actions, whether it is asking for the withdrawal of troops or launching a nuclear bomb, anyway, it is terrorism that kills me, and it is easy to understand. The traitor is a small person, betrayed by brainwashing to make money, and it is reasonable. In this film, the villain of the special service director, under the setting of Eagle extremists, it is understandable to engage in a conspiracy to kill the president and replace the president to continue the war, but it is not easy to understand the reckless launch of a lot of nuclear bombs. The ideal should be American imperialism to conquer the world, not a nuclear bomb fireworks to destroy everyone together. Let's look at the speaker again. The logic of the speaker's behavior is the most inexplicable. His purpose is to be the president himself, so it's enough to help kill the president. Why provide the villain with the nuclear bomb launch code? Does he want to be the last American president in human history? Moreover, he is already the president of the United States if he does not give the code to launch the nuclear bomb. There is no need to cooperate with other villains. It is better to say that the former president is useless to the hijackers if he does not give the code. The former president will die faster. More able to sit firmly on the presidency.
Finally, let’s look at the reaction of the government and the military: in “The White House Has Fallen”, they never gave up on the rescue of the hostages and the president, so it is understandable that considering the safety of the hostages, there has been no forcible intrusion, and the villain has indeed been executed after the failure of the seal intrusion. Hostages, in line with the behavior logic of the kidnappers and rescuers. What we see in this film is that the government and the army have long given up saving the hostages, not to mention that the Speaker wants the president to die sooner. If that's the case, wouldn't the direct invasion of the National Guard solve the problem? In the end, no one mentioned it. And the villain of this film did not execute a hostage from beginning to end, not even after the failure of the delta intrusion. You are so soft-hearted, what is the deterrent effect of hijacking?
To sum up, the rationality of the behavior of the characters in this film lags behind that of "The White House Has Fallen", especially the villains, I have absolutely no idea what they want.
View more about White House Down reviews
