Many people have learned from this film how to deal with people and how to play tricks, but I vaguely feel that the director also Putting this issue into a movie to enlarge it, that is: the right and wrong debate on an issue, the result is not important, the important thing is the process is a technique for expressing your point of view. Nick Naylor in the film is a man of great skill, blurring the public eye and shifting the focus. The whole film is filled with the "sophistication" style disdainful of high school political teachers.
Let us see: In the United States, it is no longer an era when the public said that the public is reasonable and the mother said that the mother is reasonable, nor is it an era of black, black and white, but an era full of skills and arguments, as long as you put forward new arguments, even if Ridiculous, as long as it can distract the public!
It's a bit sad, just like watching a debate competition, the result of a debate topic is not important, in fact, the winner is mainly to see whether its debating skills are better.
However, it is still very important for a handsome guy to lead the role. I was immediately attracted by the picture--it can be seen that it is impossible for a PR person to not be handsome. How could that senator's assistant, with a messy beard, be such a big deal? ! (Is this another metaphor given to us by the director?)
View more about Thank You for Smoking reviews
