I thought that the focus of this film was the Munich massacre, but after reading it, I realized that it was mainly about Mossad's revenge. With such a complex national, national, political and social issue, Spielberg can't please all audiences no matter how high he stands. For example, I can't accept the 'objective fact' that the film reminds me that 'Pakistan radicals are also human' from time to time, because I hate to pass The way to kill innocent people to achieve what they think is a noble purpose, so I am disgusted to see the aura of compassion on them.
But I agree with what the male protagonist said at the end, killing a terrorist may have a more murderous replacement, and retribution for grievances cannot bring peace, so their revenge method is also wrong. Perhaps the greater significance of this movie is to make everyone think about the price of revenge and the way to implement justice, and then it is the question of where the racial conflict should go. Then how to ease ethnic conflicts? I only know that it is not enough to blindly play green and green guns on the Internet, but I am about to look at the great cause of building an army. I believe that any answers can be found there?
-------------
After thinking about it, I still don't think it's right! Analyzing terrorists from a humanitarian standpoint does not mean understanding what they are doing, nor does it mean ignoring their subjective factors. Instead, we can analyze the causes and consequences of things from other perspectives, so as to try to find better solutions. Method. We shouldn't go to extremes, even if we don't want to see them as human beings because of our personal emotions, we can't scold those who see them as human beings?
View more about Munich reviews
