The gray and messy footage created in the film creates a terrifying and depressing atmosphere. After watching it for a while, I still feel a little tight in my chest, but with only Samsung, of course, it is difficult to shoot real historical events, but I feel that the director still did not shoot my expectations. The director focuses on the inner role of the protagonist. It can be said that it starts from a very small perspective, and does not restore the historical events as a whole. The sense of history is a bit weak, and the interrogation of old people is stronger. What I don't like is that the director imposes some of his own values and fictional plots, which makes the film a little bit different from the historical facts. It is either a dramatic commercial film or a serious historical film, but this film is always Weird in between. For example, Mossad should be fast-trained and experienced in performing tasks, but what the hell is it that kills people in the film and scare himself half to death, even if the director wants to express his reverence for life, then this should be changed. It's too outrageous, and this revenge operation was carried out with the purpose of killing a thousand by mistake and not letting one go. Many times, the agents in the film would even give up planning for a long time because of an innocent person. Obviously, it was the director's own treatment. According to the comments, if the historical facts are completely restored, it will provoke the anger of the Arabs, but this is too glorified of the Israelis, and it adds a sense of justice to their revenge. Furthermore, as a historical theme, some American humor designed in the film really makes people playful Serious tasks and jokes in the mood, is it a strong Hollywood flavor? Of course, it is not without merit. The episode in which the protagonist and the Palestinian agent Ali smoked and talked on the balcony discussing the country and the country is a classic, but it just raised questions without answers. As a director, any film you make will definitely infiltrate your own understanding and values, but for historical themes, I feel that the historical facts must be restored in the general direction, and the director should not do the work of the screenwriter. It is necessary to present a relatively real incident to the audience from an artistic point of view. I feel that this film has been changed a bit too far, and it is a bit suspicious of selling dog meat. If the director restores the brutality of the Mossad, it will cause the audience to rebel against the war. Think, instead of making decisions, tell the audience what to think. If you want to make decisions, please don't touch historical events. Of course, it does not mean to make a documentary. You can add your own understanding or raise questions by throwing questions to the audience, such as the most classic scene mentioned in the previous paragraph.
The historical event that shocked the world was changed by the director into an educational film of "Look, no matter what the reason for killing people, you will live in condemnation of yourself for the rest of your life", which is a bit speechless.
View more about Munich reviews
