I tried my best to understand Shakespeare's works, but ended up in the absence of my own perceptual aesthetics. People who are "Fengshen" or their works always want to know how good they are. After some recitation performances, I vaguely seem to feel the charm of his works at certain moments. This film was once translated as "Shakespeare in Love". At the beginning of the film, the actors wrote and painted, and they acted as literary figures. It is easy to exaggerate and exaggerate whether they are domestic or foreign. I felt the same way when I first saw Fein. : Too exaggerated. Later, I used to see that he maintained a "fanatic" energy throughout the movie. Maybe this is the attitude of a top writer understood by the actor? Aside from these, the male protagonist absorbs the nutrients of creation from the life of the city and all kinds of people, including his lover. The female protagonist does not have much creative space in this film. It is like the male protagonist creates a character like a muse. After winning the award~ Shakespeare's theme has its own buff blessing. His heroine has no name that is not beautiful, no character that is not beautiful, and no lack of charm. He depicts brave or intelligent female characters. These adjectives were previously the characteristics of male protagonists, and there are also traditional female aesthetics such as gentle and loyal queens. He admired women, or he must have felt mostly positive power from the women he came into contact with. The dialogue between the heroine holding gold coins and Fein in the movie is a scene that I feel more emotionally. They can't see each other again. The fate of the heroine is unpredictable. The relationship between the two ends abruptly at the climax. Such as spawning a superb poet, such as killing a woman who is deeply in love.
View more about Shakespeare in Love reviews
