It's considered average among the best pictures in the Oscars, much better than the mental retardation "The Hurt Locker" and the fake "Slumdog Millionaire" that play personal heroism on the battlefield.
The heroine Wingenice's acting skills are average, far from the level of Cate Blanchett in "Midnight in Paris", but it is not the most watery.
I will list a few good Oscar winners, Emma Stone in La La Land, Sunderland Bullock in Weakness, Francis McDormand in Frozen , Diane Keaton in "Annie Hall." Which of the four eldest sisters in these four works dares to say that they are better than Wingnes? To put it bluntly, the performance level of the best actress in the Oscars is generally not high, and it may not be much better than the golden horse and golden rooster. The best male protagonist is awesome, and it beats all the actors in the world.
If it weren't for the fact that the movie was called "the best film of all time" and the heroine was called the "best female lead of all time", I wouldn't watch it at all. It seems that many people who hate this film seem to have not seen a few Oscar movies.
Follow the trend of black real SB.
View more about Shakespeare in Love reviews
