There are not many roles in the film. What is rare is that there are obvious lack of heart among these few: the
heroine Jennifer: young and beautiful, but she wants to live alone in a strange place off the beaten track. I don’t know how many things like this in the United States are. Many;
Assailant Matthew: He can't even speak a word, obviously mentally disabled;
Assailant Stanley: Different from ordinary criminals who are committed to destroying evidence, he loves to create evidence by himself and takes a detailed picture of the crime process;
Many people criticize the film because of this. I think it's the opposite. Does this seem real? Paranoia and SB are everywhere in real life.
The director didn't know whether he was considering the box office or wanting to be true. He magnified every detail of violence and pornography, and delicately showed the audience a magnificent picture of heavy flavors.
The voyeurism, harassment, and rape in the first half of the stage progressed one after another, which was really embarrassing. The same good scenery, the same lakeside, the same law, the same loss of humanity, I thought it was another "Lake of Eden" film. But when the heroine plunged into the river, the whole movie rose from "Lake of Eden" and jumped directly to "Kill Bill". Jennifer grows a wise man by eating a ditch and gaining wisdom, and she becomes the goddess of vengeance, giving full play to the writer's imagination, and incorporating the bizarre and ups and downs that can only be put into the work in the ordinary time into the revenge plan.
In the past few days, many people are discussing whether they should draw the knife or pass the QJ. Individually, it is undoubtedly safer to pass the set than to draw a knife, but on the whole, a society that passes the set every QJ will only encourage the arrogance of the QJ. Sometimes it doesn't make sense to be reasonable, and it is the best choice to use violence to control violence when necessary.
In the case of this film, the heroine's successful murderous revenge is so impressive, at least it makes me feel relieved. Rather than informing the government in a country where there is no death penalty and then inking a lawsuit that may last for several years and may not have a chance of winning, it is simple and decisive to choose revenge. In troubled times, heavy punishments are used, and lenient punishments are still used in prosperous times. This is true for society and for individuals. There is no need for the Salvation Faction to deal with such wicked people, as long as the Adventists are good, and not killing is not enough to vent their anger.
The heroine's begging for mercy in the first half of the film and the assailant's begging for mercy in the second half of the film are in harmony. People are always responsible for what they have done. Except for Johnny who would rather die than surrender, the other four lowered their noble heads in the face of life threats. Did not face up to the dripping blood.
It’s true to be forgiving and forgiving, but there is a premise that it is worthwhile. Forgiveness is also relative. If you don't let others go when you are in power, naturally you can't expect others to let you go when they are in power. In fact, everyone understands these principles, but many times they are too self-confident or overwhelmed to forget the degree.
Fengshui turns, don't do everything. When you are unforgivable, you only know that blindly mumbling sorry and please have a trick!
View more about I Spit on Your Grave reviews
