Remember what to say. Go to bed after vomiting.
Friend A highly recommended it to me. Friend B and I watched it at night, and could hardly watch it. After watching it, I wanted to die. All thought it was a bad movie. On the same night, we also watched Deep Space Amnesia. In contrast, the horror of the Deep Space Amnesia ending directly upgraded it to at least 3 stars. I mean, Mindhunter doesn't even have a bright spot.
No nonsense. Mindhunter was good at the beginning, and it was quite sensational before going to the island. But everything ends here.
Tucao 1
why I always use the English name Mindhunter, not that I installed 13, but the film is too installed. This term corresponds to the kind of profession in the film, similar to the reasoning detective. whatever, the protagonist and his party should be professional and trained. Therefore, we are expecting a team of professional agents to calculate and reason with each other to find out the real culprit. but? The performance of these gadgets in panic on the island is almost inferior to high school students (take my high school period as an example...= =). Don't worry about it at all, let's talk about it in detail. It is also the most unacceptable place for me and my friends. The job name is so good, Mindhunter, v587, in fact, a group of people are more than one.
Tucao 2 is the
same as 1. If a group of people are trained professionals, after the death of the captain on the island, they found that the black man had information about the island, and he immediately picked up the gun and *almost concluded* that he did it. I rub, the unity of mentally retarded behavior is outrageous.
I ca
n't remember some details of Tucao 3. I watched this film n years ago. That is, they found small blood clots in the nails of the deceased, and then used DNA to identify them as female pigs. Then all raised their guns to the female pigs. The unity of mentally handicapped behavior once again surprised us. Leaving aside the dna test with a sledgehammer, in that movie, the female pig has no plot to be injured. Hey! Where does the blood come from! ! ? After stepping back ten thousand steps, I said that even if it is the blood of a female pig, why is there a female pig's blood in her nails, which was killed by the female pig? It was everyone who *almost concluded* that she did it again. I served this group of Mindhunter.
Tucao 4
There is also the brain damage of drinking coffee, many people have pointed out, I will not repeat it. Simply mention, how can tmd everyone fall asleep at the same time. And all have to drink coffee.
Tucao 5
This is also a very important point, the person who was killed by the liquid nitrogen at first was killed. It seems that there is no point that must be triggered based on his habits. A simple example is that the murderer knows that he likes to eat lollipops, and put a lollipop in that room. The candy box can trigger the mechanism of liquid nitrogen. That person's death feels very random.
Tucao 6
also has to talk about the setting of outstanding cases. I think that the answer level for a mystery is worthy of the puzzle. For example, the level of information conveyed by a small piece of paper is different from the level of information conveyed by a grandiose scene. This kind of design is not logically unreasonable, but it makes people feel awkward in reason. The commendatory term we often use is called "sacred stick", and the derogatory term is called "dog blood". In Mindhunter, there are all kinds of dog blood. The typical thing is that the room is filled with red numbers. In the end, the murderer only wants to convey a blablabla at the speed of light. Then, can you just write one on the table? I want to have a visual impact, I understand, but this gorgeous mystery surface and the thin mystery information are completely asymmetrical. I don't know if you have this experience when you look at it. My friend and I exclaimed together when I watched, I c! That's what the numbers in a room mean! ! ? ? ?
Tucao 7
who is the murderer. In fact, the more dissimilar it became. After watching it for 20 minutes, I knew the level of the screenwriter, and I also knew that this film could not break away from this stereotype, and I guessed who the murderer was about halfway through the film. Of course, clichés can also be wonderful. I am not criticizing clichés. But the source and reason of the murderer's perversion is too blunt. Many people have said it too, I will not say it anymore.
After watching this movie that year, I asked my friend a, why do you think this movie is so good? He said, because I never guessed who the murderer was. Well, I think this is the only place in this film that can be seen relatively well. However, "I have never guessed who the murderer is" and "This film is very good" cannot be equated at all. I don't know what kind of evaluation people give high marks.
If the film is about a group of young high school students coming to the island to happen such a thing, I might give this film 3 stars. It's just that Mindhunter's domineering and professional career setting makes me suspect that the screenwriter is suspicious of the audience's IQ.
View more about Mindhunters reviews
