It should be said that the film still has certain characters and plots. Instead of blindly shooting and killing, it has made a certain discussion on the choice of human nature and machines, and also used a lot of ink to describe the sheriff's reaction after wearing the iron armor. Emotional entanglements in the family.
But I think the end of the film is a bit far-fetched. The sheriff will kill the local tyrant just by relying on the professor's one-sided remarks. You, as the sheriff, have to do some investigation anyway. Of course, the conflict between you and the local tyrant has a long history, but you don't need to kill him. Isn't this a public revenge? It's even a little ungrateful. They also gave you a second spring. .
Besides, the local tyrants are also brain-damaged. Obviously, you are a red character and the sheriff can't move you. Can't you just catch it? Anyway, the sheriff has nothing to do with you. Does he have any evidence? Even if he has so little clues, it can be easily flattened by your ability to move at the top. It's too unconfident to take other people's wives and children as hostages. It can only be said that you died under your own arrogance and brain damage.
There is also a point that I don't understand why the sheriff of a company's product is n times stronger than which robots? The director said: The plot needs it.
View more about RoboCop reviews
