View more about RoboCop reviews
On the ugliness of human nature and the brainwashing of technology
Elaina 2022-04-24 07:01:04
For the latest Robocop, 80% of people watch it with a nostalgic mentality. Many people have seen the 1987 version of Robocop. The boss did not write about technology, but focused on human nature. At that time, the Detroit government went bankrupt and public order. Chaos A consortium created a robot with human limbs in order to build prestige. It was Boss Murphy's profoundly written out of the ugliest side of human nature at that time. The OCP high-level infighting and insidiousness was very decadent on the street. It was very thought-provoking and not like the new version. Anyone who knows the old way knows that the director is Jose who has filmed the special forces. Polia's description of human nature in the new version is a brushstroke, because no one will watch this kind of film. The quality of human nature is to watch cool fighting and The new version of the progress of science and technology cannot be compared with the boss, because the starting point is different, the process and the result are naturally different. Of course, they have a common feature that is bloody (only for the clip of the operation). I really recommend not to use the boss's point of view to see this version. At the beginning of the political brainwashing, I don't express all opinions. About this film, it is still very good. I must use an objective psychology. Murphy can't live forever and can't run clumsy.
Extended Reading
-
Dewitt 2022-03-25 09:01:06
The Brazilian director of this elite unit is stunned to make Robocop Batman Are you kidding me? After watching it continuously, I can understand that the short-lived appearance of the theme, which pays tribute to the old version, is still a full-blown emotional drama. It seems too deliberate and too hard. The era of tough guys is gone forever~
-
Lonzo 2022-03-22 09:01:30
Robocop "I'm back!" - after watching - after reading the new version, he decisively upgraded the old version to four stars. The original version is more watchable, and as a "fun" movie should be a higher priority. Although this one is not too ugly, it is obviously stuck in the mud of rigid reflection on mechanization and routine - neither new nor thorough thinking.
-
Dr. Dennett Norton: He suffered 4th degree burns over 80% of his body. Lower spine has been severed. If he survives, he'll be paralyzed from the waist down and confined to a wheelchair. Mrs. Murphy, we... we don't have to do this.
Clara Murphy: I need to know everything before I make a decision. Please continue.
Dr. Dennett Norton: Vestibulocochlear, optical nerves have been critically damaged. He'll be blind in one eye. Most likely deaf.
Dr. Alan: Frankly, Dr. Norton and the Omni Foundation are the leaders in this field. In my opinion, this is the only chance your husband has. I'd seriously consider their offer.
Clara Murphy: I'm sorry, Doctor. I need time to think.
Liz Kline: I'm afraid, Mrs. Murphy, time is one thing you don't have.
Clara Murphy: You said you could save him, but what does that mean? What kind of life will he have?
-
Raymond Sellars: Alex, we need to work together here, because I'm the only one with the technology to keep you alive.
RoboCop: Dead or alive, you're coming with me.