Seeing the Sadness of Present Scientific Spirit from Robocop

Doris 2022-04-23 07:01:34

As the main developer of the Robocop program, Dr. Dennett has a lot of scenes in the film, and the film depicts his character is also very distinctive.
He first appeared at the Omnium Foundation Rehabilitation Center, using technology to provide assistance to disabled people and enable them to have normal mobility.
When the president approached him for negotiation, he said something like "We have agreed on this a long time ago, I won't be asked to develop combated application. My work here is driven by own question" It can be seen from this that Dene Dr. Te had previously developed combat programs and used his technology to serve in warfare, but because of his belief he eventually gave up using technology for killing and instead served the rehabilitation of the disabled.
It's a pity that technology is always a double-edged sword, and people with such superb skills are already amazing, but even such amazing people have no control over the use of this technology and its consequences.
The president first affirmed and praised his technology, and then said, "I have found a research fund that can bring you very considerable research funds, and can save thousands of lives." Faced with such a problem, it seems that it should not be There is any hesitation, because a project can have a lot of funding to maintain research and save many people's lives, no matter what kind of scientific researcher will not refuse. What's more, from the front of the film, this doctor is a relatively honest doctor. What if this persuasion is not true? If there is no motive for this persuasion? In my opinion, the first half of this persuasive sentence is what attracts the film and the real world, and the second half is mostly a good word (a lie, to put it bluntly).
Although we can say that the emergence of Robocop stopped crime, abolished the bill to allow artificial intelligence to assist in management, saved many lives, and so on. However, we need to understand that this is a company that lives not to save lives, but to make high profits. Just as researchers want to develop technology, they also need a source of funds. Many people would say that they must have their own beliefs. On the one hand, they must obtain the correct source of funds to do things that are beneficial to human society. But don't forget, even if you think that the doctor in the film generally has his own beliefs, you will still be fooled. Because for the president, Robocop is just a tool to make people recognize the tool of robot law enforcement.
In the film, during the research and development process, Dr. step by step, at the request and instigation of the president, he made a moral borderline, canceling the emotional cognitive influence of the Robocop in combat, and reducing the hormones such as dopamine in his body that affect emotions. , refusing to let Robocop meet his family, etc. In the end, when the president wanted to get rid of RoboCop, he only agreed after ten years of research funding, the right to form his own team, and the highest compensation from the cops' families. In the movie, we can understand that he is a delayer, but we all know that - this is a movie. What about the real world?
Capital is above technology. Even the most skilled person has to be driven by technology. The spirit of science is often trampled by capital. From this point of view, it is not surprising that China's current "brick family", "called beast" and so-called "academicians".

View more about RoboCop reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ruthie 2022-03-22 09:01:30

    It was because of this new version of "Robocop" that I learned about the old version of "Robocop". At that time, I didn’t watch the movie because of limited interest. Now I follow this series. I feel that the story of the 2014 version of “RoboCop” and the 1987 version of “RoboCop” is quite different. I couldn’t make it more exciting with the help of modern special effects, but it made me feel a little bit. Boring, but a little pleasant surprise to see Samuel L. Jackson, Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton starring.

  • Meaghan 2022-03-25 09:01:06

    Has been dog blood has been copying has been fireworks. But there are still political rhetoric and sociological simulations worth highlighting in this film, similar to The Dark Knight, although the level of completion is obviously not as good as the latter. When you face the decision of who to trust with your life and wealth, do you choose efficiency and ignore the shortcomings of physical properties, or do you choose spirituality and tolerate ugly benefits to transfer genes? Unplugged, he will return to being a free individual and bring justice to himself and the rest of society.

RoboCop quotes

  • Rick Mattox: I wouldn't buy that for a dollar.

  • Raymond Sellars: What's bigger than a hero?

    Rick Mattox: Dead hero.