But I think Depp's film should be much better than his last film.
However, in films like "Transcendental Hackers" that discuss and debate the future, the role of the actors seems to be only to set off and drive the box office, and the acting skills seem to have little effect here.
People are always afraid of new things because they don't understand them. I have discussed this issue with some friends who have seen "Transcendence", and most people's attitude is that we must have freedom, to be transcended is to be controlled by Depp, so we can't do that, quite a bit. A little "free or die" tragic and solemn.
However, what if the man wasn't Depp? Suppose the so-called creator of all this transcendence is a God from an alien planet?
It's just that everyone must allow the creator to share a body with them while they are immortal, but isn't this also the ultimate wish of those who believe in God or other gods and Buddhas?
In fact, we can think of it this way. Everyone’s soul is actually another existence in our body. If God comes with a halo all over his body and appears, I believe most people should be grateful.
May the Lord be with me.
It's just that when the Lord is really with you and occasionally uses your body to convey some of his voice to the world, people start to get scared.
The Lord can be with me, but not when this Creator is my former companion.
So there is a war to destroy Depp under the banner of freedom, even at the expense of using the person he loves the most, but until the end, Depp actually knew everything, but he chose love, chose to let go...
everything It seems to be back to normal. But
does it mean that a step-by-step life is better? Sick when it's time to be sick, die when it's time to die.
Look at what the film shows us at the end: no bread, no milk, nothing...
You get a sickly body that will never recover, you get a devastated earth that no one knows, how long it will last, no one knows.
View more about Transcendence reviews
