This is a state that cannot be changed at all. The contradictions and interactions between belief and unbelief have run through almost every minute historical moment of human existence until now. From the spiritual to the physical, it is probably the instinctive impulse of every believer to completely "convince" an unbeliever or a disbeliever. It is also the only way for them to obtain the highest satisfaction and psychological sublimation in their own beliefs.
From this point of view, the so-called "freedom of belief" is really a very ridiculous thing. It is more ridiculous to choose one's own beliefs independently than to preach "freedom of belief". Before belief has not yet achieved a system, and then formed the three systems of ritual, theory and Sangha necessary for religion, it is basically a model and carrier of living habits. For an ignorant and ignorant new life who can't choose his birth environment at all, the so-called "right to choose" is simply empty talk. And when faith eventually becomes religion, the huge habitual power that penetrates into every detail of life, combined with a set of belief theories that are not necessarily rational but must be absolutely rigorous, penetrates into this environment through complicated worship ceremonies. in the marrow of a new life. Except in exceptional circumstances, no one can escape the grip of this intellectual authority.
In this case, the question of whether to grant the "right to choose" exists only between believers living in different circumstances. But unfortunately, there has never been an era, even today, when the giving and acquisition of such rights can be peaceful.
During the journey of Jesus carrying the cross, all external injuries, even like the blood in the movie, are still bearable to a person with firm belief. But it is precisely those believers who once prostrate at the feet of Jesus, hoping to obtain the protection of heaven and God, and the tyranny of Jesus' heart and faith at this time is the most deadly. Because the biggest fear of believers stems from doubts about their beliefs.
The hostility of the Jewish elders to Jesus is not so much based on a conflict of faith, but rather an inevitable reaction when interests are threatened. The Roman governor was more concerned about how to control the territory and not to have uncontrollable riots that would affect his rule. And those "onlookers who don't know the truth", including us onlookers who travel through time and space through movies, have an estimated influence on the changes in Jesus' beliefs. Therefore, on the final road where Jesus lived as a human being, in the world of faith, probably only Jesus and his God existed. Either at the beginning or at the end. The fall and redemption of Jesus as a believer actually has little to do with all of the above-mentioned people.
No one else can save himself but himself. Faith is a very personal thing no matter who, what group, organization or even country. You really shouldn't do anything other than yourself in the name of faith.
As for God, it should be a completely different species other than humans. Any attempt to link these two creatures, if not ignorance, must be deeply suspicious of its motives.
View more about The Passion of the Christ reviews
