Tell the story first.
One: Johnson: Can you drive a plane, a boat, or steal a car? Are you still just a rescuer? ?
Johnson, who is covered by sea, land and air, should really be regarded as a special forces soldier, but he can actually dive and swim as a rescuer. The bodyguards of the President of the United States are not as powerful as you! !
Besides, the movie should describe the tenderness of tough guys in a customary way. Tough guys should be reflected in the actors' muscles and various tricks. The tenderness here should be to save the wife and daughter. But! ! ! The tenderness here is so wrong! ! In the next scene, he told his daughter to hold on, and then he watched her until she couldn't hold it any longer and drowned, so he kicked the door open a few times, I: ? ? ? ? Do you have time to kick the door open in a few seconds, but watch your daughter suffer and suffer for a while? It can only be said that tough guys may be enough, but this tender sensationalism is too (te) enough (me) to (gou) position (xue).
Two: Cara Gugino: Just ditching the rescuers and getting on a "boss's boss' boss"? Are you a Cinderella? ?
Before her restaurant collapsed due to an earthquake, she was "discussing" some issues with a tall lady. The other party is obviously dissatisfied with her relationship with the "boss's boss's boss", and the other party also needs exquisite makeup, and there is exquisite makeup, and if you want tall clothes, you have tall clothes. What's up with Cara Gugino? The vicissitudes of life with little makeup on the face, undressed hair, and an ex-husband who was a rescuer.
I just want to say that "the boss of the boss's boss" wouldn't find someone like this...
3: Aingrafd (Daniel): a big crocodile, so lonely on the bridge to give containers smashed to death? ? No plane, no bodyguard, no spare car? Don't carry a cell phone with you?
As a "boss's boss' boss", even if you really don't have a private jet (although it's unlikely), you always know a few people who have private jets or fly them! Although I know that movies also like to advocate justice, it is anti-justice to make justice so utopian.
PS Some people may ask this big boss didn't he take a private jet with his daughter before? Let me tell you about popular science, that plane is not necessarily a private plane. There are many small planes in small airports in the United States. You can take them with money, and they are not expensive.
Four: Alexandra (Black): Well, a good figure, well-deserved reputation.
The best part of the whole film is the shot of Blake swimming in the water (not much to say about this). But the plot also distorts the role of a calm daughter too exaggeratedly. Every time the flood came over, the flood just drowned her neck and stopped! ! And as a daughter with little experience, it is easier than all adults to encounter this kind of thing! ! (Not cool, "light", mind you.) She doesn't show the coolness of panic in the face of disaster; her performance throughout the film feels like she's in a little trouble on vacation and then The story she solved.
Five: Caltech. Yep, it's Caltech.
I didn't want to complain, but when I saw this amazing ad placement, I silently closed my eyes in the movie theater... When the doctor said that he didn't know how to let people know to evacuate quickly, the doctor said something..." There's nothing that can't be solved, because this is Caltech."
Yes, there's nothing that can't be done with bloody plots and lines, because this is "Doomsday."
------------------------------The dividing line after finishing the story------------- ------------------------
Many people say that they are all directed at 3D.
Forget it, this 3D is no different from 2D.
The reason to watch 3D is not because 3D can provide a sense of substitution: we "experience" the big water when it rolls over; when the glass slag is flying towards us, we almost hit the glass slag. However, this film really does not have much application of 3D, except for the scene where the helicopter cuts down in the title.
Doraemon and this film are different in nature, but because they are both 3D, it is possible to compare the application of 3D between the two films. In Doraemon, Nobita and the robot cat almost hit this one and that one in flight. The sense of substitution is very strong. In contrast, the apocalypse collapsed, um, the container hit the bridge and the flood did wash down the building, but we all saw it as a bystander, and the sense of substitution that 3D should have wasted.
-------------------------------------------- Anyway----- ---------------------------------------
In short, this is a bad movie, don't waste it money.
Its science is also terrible, welcome to Baidu or Google to complain about it from seismologists.
View more about San Andreas reviews
