One SCI excellent paper

Alan 2022-07-31 23:05:58

I don't know when I started to be interested in documentaries. Although I don't cover much, I think a good documentary should be as clear and organized as a regular article. In terms of natural sciences, BBC's films are like explanatory essays, all in one go; for social sciences, this film can definitely be selected as a textbook for argumentative essays. The reasons are as follows:

First, the argument is clear and straightforward. From the very beginning, I put forward the curse of deregulation. From the beginning of the Icelandic quotation to the final point of the mainstream landing on the Statue of Liberty, the central idea runs through.

Secondly, the arguments are informative and informative. The first-hand interview data of many heavyweights in the political and economic circles in the film is quite powerful, coupled with rich historical statements and statistics, especially those old newspapers and tax forms that are all turned out, which is quite a textual research.

In the end, the argument is sufficient and well-founded. The whole film is mainly based on the tone of interview and narration, presents facts and makes sense, the five parts are structured in a meticulous and logical manner, and the ins and outs are analyzed in the first place. With statistical charts, it demonstrates a rigorous academic style.

Therefore, in the eyes of the judges of the Academy of Oscars, this film is definitely an excellent SCI paper, and it is inevitable to win an award. For ordinary viewers, although this paper is serious but not boring, thanks to the excellent soundtrack and editing, the big time and the ending song congratulations after the introduction are very good. In addition, in addition to the calm narrative, there are occasional conscientious provocations in the film, with a calm voice-over to respond to the anxious interviewees, and the subtitles that refuse to accept the interview are even more silent than sound. A single move hits the key points and quickly occupied the moral high ground. The audience was filled with indignation and reached the highest level of self-evident argument. So I can also fully understand that the guy who translated the pirated discs must have been so angry that he had forgotten to listen carefully to the various data mentioned in the interview, and was eager to expose the greed and shamelessness of Wall Street to the broad masses of the motherland. It was like writing unconsciously. Mercury flooded the ground, the feeling of anger leaped on the paper, and the conversation digressed far and wide. .

PS: The Andrew Sheng in the film said: "A real engineer builds bridges, a financial engineer builds dreams". At that time, he took a look at his title as Chief Advisor of China Banking Regulatory Commission. I thought that our party still has such talents. Accept this interview. Can you say such a talented thing? Turning back to Baidu, it turned out to be the former chairman of the Hong Kong Securities Regulatory Commission, a Malaysian. .

View more about Inside Job reviews

Extended Reading

Inside Job quotes

  • title card: The presidents of Harvard University and Columbia University refused to comment on academic conflicts of interest. - Both declined to be interviewed for this film.

  • interviewer: On your CV the title of this report has been changed from "Financial Stability in Iceland" to "Financial *In*stability in Iceland."

    Frederic Mishkin: Um, well, I don't know. Er, which, er whatever it is, is - the thing - if there's a typo, there's a typo.