- "Born to Kill"
2016.1.14
I really only want to die to watch a movie like "Born to Kill" whose three views are inconsistent with my character.
This is based on real events. Maybe the events were originally so bad, and the director just presented them objectively and artistically.
do not know.
However, during the riots in the prisons, I saw prison guards being abused by prisoners in various revengeful ways - late, machine washing, steaming, accompanied by strong and cheerful background music with drums, from sight to hearing, they were suffering.
The film mainly focuses on the murder process of Mickey and May. The crowd's enthusiasm, media reports, police tracking and other clues are mixed with flashbacks of the two's memories. Comics and animal world documentaries are used to present violence and sexuality. The picture, the former weakens the bloody taste of the picture, while the latter seems to tell you: this is just the nature of human beings as animals.
The media's reports on Mickey and May in the film are more of a "curious" mentality to win gimmicks, and the direct trigger for the prison riots is also a live broadcast of Mickey's interview. The masses, especially teenagers, are more worshipped and adored. Common comments were "cool," "personal," and "be yourself," with one saying: "I'm not saying I agree with them, but if I'm a killer, I want to be like Mickey and May." Yes Well, moral condemnation aside, Mickey and May's actions seem to represent the repressed nature of man.
In the interview, Mickey mocked Ronkiel and said: My pure moment is better than your life of lies. Dramatically, Jungkil became one of Mickey's during the riot, begging Mickey to take him, and in the thrill of killing, he felt for the first time that he was truly alive.
Perhaps the only ones resenting Mickey and May the most are the police, who have killed a lot of them after all. Jack, who was the main "hunter" at that time, was only a sanctimonious policeman who was chasing for the pursuit, and even nearly collapsed (perhaps already collapsed) in the process of pursuit, killing a prostitute , and at the same time he has a perverted possessiveness towards Mei.
Why kill?
Such a question is quite ridiculous to Mickey. He thinks that killing is killing, why should there be a reason.
They are innocent.
innocent? Everyone has a sinful past. Maybe many people have already had enough and don't want to live, they just help to get on the road.
They can kill people all the way so recklessly, I think because there is no such thing as a sense of guilt in them, their minds have separated from the so-called civilized society and returned to primitive people. At this time, Mickey and May, wolves and snakes in nature until death, whether it is killing sex or eating and sleeping, it is just an instinct.
One or two primitive people can turn a prison and a city upside down. If there are thousands of primitive people, then this society should also be the most primitive barbaric society.
The film spends a lot of ink on the portrayal of violent media. In the end, the famous host Ronkiel was shot and killed, which can be regarded as a reasonable "home" for the violent media.
However, from the film itself, is this another way of spreading violent media? In the end, not only did Mickey and May fail to fight the law, but they also had a few lovely children, and the RV was full of laughter and laughter. Will homicidal couples evolve into homicidal family squads? Think carefully.
From the way the film was shot, I can give 5 stars or more. Black and white, picture distortion, drama within the play, the vision and hearing are torn apart, the novelty does not feel abrupt, and the story can be clearly explained. However, the plot and ending are still a bit difficult to accept.
View more about Natural Born Killers reviews
