January 7, 2022 at 5:15pm speech-to-text
Just finished watching the real lion version of The Lion King. Don't want to type, let's record the instant feeling.
Well, I heard their comments on this film when I was listening to the villain's film review. Out of the mood that I wanted to watch the movie well, I wanted to hear them talk about one, and then I was watching one here for comparison. I just watched it, so let me tell you what they said about the film.
I was very impressed that Bomi said a sentence, and it was full of harsh words. I think the advantage of this work is that it has spent hundreds of millions of dollars to prove the irreplaceability of 2D animation movies.
Generally speaking, everyone feels that this film is wrong from the beginning, the kind of flaw brought out from the mother's womb. The first is the expressive power of animals, which is not as strong as others. The original cartoon used the image of animals to express the things in Shakespeare's plays. I was able to hold it with the 2d image, but if it was put on the 3d, it would be greatly dissipated, so you can see that the dubbing and the picture are very incompatible, so that some guests said , I feel like I'm just watching those videos on Douyin dubbing cats and dogs.
To be honest, the feeling was very obvious when I watched a few scenes. Especially in my favorite part of the cartoon, Nana and Simba sang in the process of getting rid of the Shazu. When they put it in the real version, they felt that there was no expressive force at all, and it felt very inconsistent. It's like that kind of cut like that Granny, Animal World and then cut it out with that Lion King music.
Then let me talk about my feelings. In fact, when I started, I felt a little strange, because I just watched Qingshan in Africa and watched the ideal program. It is about animal behavior, and then he talked about a lot of his experience of watching lions and cheetahs in Africa, and then he lived in the African savannah all year round and summarized some animal habits from his observations of those animals.
Then when I watched it, I first thought that God, this is the greatness of human creation, that is, it can make the picture that is impossible to appear on the grassland so truly present in front of us. In fact, the villain film critic said that he did not give people a sense of wonder, but I think there is. Because these pictures are impossible to appear on the real African savannah. There is a scene where there are many birds parked on the ivory of the elephant. There is an identical shot in the cartoon, and it turns it into a real animal version, which is very novel. I am even thinking that if human beings become extinct, and this kind of image remains, will people who come to see it later think that this is how Africa was at that time, or that this is a documentary? That was the thought at the time.
But this idea didn't last long, and when I was about to watch the title, my senses had a reversal. When I saw elephants, zebras, antelopes and all kinds of animals bowing their heads to the lions, I felt a sense of discomfort. This is absolutely impossible on the prairie, so what kind of people are you? , isn't it enough for you to make cartoons? You still have to use the image of this animal to do such a thing to humiliate animals. Does it mean that your desire to control has reached this level? Anyway, when I watched it at the time, there was a Kind of uncomfortable feeling. I think it's really disrespectful to animals.
One is the lack of performance I just said
One is the intuitive feeling it gave me in the process of watching the real lion version
But at the end of the day, I can really feel the obvious impact of its text. Especially at the end, he used the same posture, a lion on the cliff, a lion lying on the edge of the cliff, and then the confrontation should appear three times in the whole film. This is the whole process of three times is the process of the growth of the Lion King.
In the end, he shot his uncle down, and then the whole raging fire burned behind, the lion's mane was blown by the wind, rising to form a distant silhouette, the tension of the text had completely overwhelmed the real thing by this time. The shortcoming of the animal's CG animation is that you can feel a surging pressure from behind the expressionless face of the lion, that is, his entire growth process is flashing in front of your eyes. Back, it was that scene that I thought was pretty good, and then I burst into tears.
Then, uh, there is another point that is quite a breakthrough, that is, my review this time, including listening to the film review, is a subversive perception. When I was a kid, when I watched The Lion King, my favorite character was Timon, especially Timon's character, so much so that when I saw me, I was right for this kind of meerkat. He should be called the fox, but that's what people used to call it. Meerkat? This animal has a very good feeling.
But this time I heard the villain's film critic say that these two are actually the kind of drug addicts in Western history. I was quite shocked. But I compared them with their behavior, what is it? I persuade the little lion not to think too much about it, let's get a bug. Then look at this plump and juicy one that looks like a nut and then Akuna Matata and whatever it is, it's really quite like doing nothing.
And then, the feelings are very complicated now. I don't know why this cartoon is set like this, or it is an excessive interpretation of the villain's film critic. I think it's quite confusing.
Aside from this layer of my own emotions, I just look at Timon and Pumbaa again. What I really like is that kind of funny. So I think if I were to rate this film, I might give it a three. It's about three points, er, between 6.5 and 7, ummm. The main reason is that her technical form is really very well-integrated.
View more about The Lion King reviews
