1. Are there any innovative original movies from Disney in recent years? have. Except for the Marvel series, whether it is "Frozen" in 2013, "Super Marines" in 2014, "Zootopia" in 2016, "Pocahontas", "Wreck King" 1 and 2, or This year's "Toy Story 4", the production is very delicate and even successful. And why does Disney spend about 200 million dollars every time to remake old 2D movies? I think it's because I want to reproduce the classics 25 years ago and I don't want to perfunctory the audience with the old 2D, so I use VR and CGI technology to bring back the movies that have touched countless people's hearts on the screen.
2. According to Fried Cold Rice, why didn't Live-Action Remake let "The Lion King" take the lead and use bigger gimmicks to make more profits? Instead, let "Fantasy Forest", which was not as influential as "The Lion King" in the history of Disney animation, come out to try first, and then remake "The Lion King" after success? I think it's the fact that he attaches great importance to this film and makes a move after careful consideration.
3. This is the only Live-Action Remake movie so far that highly restores the original animation, whether from the plot or the arrangement and soundtrack. After swiping IMAX twice, the subtle differences in animals, the attention to animals and ecology, from the control of the camera and rhythm to the music and effects, all let me see full sincerity. I have seen a lot of fans of the original book dissatisfied with the lack of animation and rich expressions on the faces of real animals. I can only say that, firstly, if real animals have many exaggerated expressions, it is a very scary thing. Second, if the eyes keep jumping back and forth between the subtitles and the screen, it is really difficult to capture the subtle expressions of their real existence. Just because it doesn't catch doesn't mean it doesn't.
4. The Disney Store has removed the most profitable Tsum Tsum and other peripherals from The Lion King without changing their prices. There are few new peripherals and very perfunctory, why not choose to make more profits like other movies when they are highly regarded? His acting style shows that he really disdains to make money with a remake of "Fried Cold Rice".
No blame, "Spirited Away", which returned to the screen this year, is also a unique and good animation in my heart. However, compared to its annual release in Regal in the United States, and this year's "a craze for its release in China after 18 years" , I saw only piety and sincerity when Disney handed in homework. Using the word "fried cold rice" to describe this year's "The Lion King" is really inappropriate.
Taking him as a new movie that respects the original, I believe it will give the audience a different and new feeling.
View more about The Lion King reviews
