The highlight is too short, of course I'm not saying that only the part in the Golden City is wonderful, although most treasure hunt movies should be so in principle. I also like the reasoning in 1. Personally, I think these reasonings are the fundamental guarantee that the National Treasure series can be different from the Indiana Jones series. To make the audience feel as if they are reading a book, turning the pages one by one, seeing the answer coming out, but still not knowing what is going on, that feeling of itchiness is the classic of this type of film.
But in this film, all the reasoning seems so simple, as if one minute someone asks you if you want a cake, the next minute the cake is in front of you. If it's that simple, I really don't know how it was discovered after hundreds of years. It can be seen that the screenwriter of the second part is either irresponsible, or Jiang Lang is exhausted. I hope that is the first answer.
Fortunately, there is still a suspense at the end, let us look forward to the third part together.
View more about
National Treasure: Book of Secrets reviews
