The heroine is good-looking, but the others are not good-looking

I expected that this remake was based on pornography, violence and revenge, and it was hard not to be disappointed. It is said that more than half an hour of film length was cut when the film was released. If it is true, the director shouldn’t compromise. What if the restriction level is increased? The gimmick and selling point of this film are not the so-called violence. And pornography? After cutting it, can you make a big profit through the screening? It turned out to be obviously not possible. It is estimated that this film was only shown in a few theaters, and the response was very few, because we could not even hear the sound of scolding him. If the DVD is not added, it is estimated that it will not be profitable, and I think The cut may not be much better, this type of film can only be profitable through DVD, although the cost of this film is not high.

It’s not that I’m so BT. The complaint is all about the film itself. The level of the original film is there. You can’t get any depth of connotation no matter how you remake it. To please the film critics, it’s better to do your job and have a good selling point. , To cater to the tastes of diehards. The QJ lens can be restrained, but the revenge part should be let go and play with new ideas.

The remake seems to have worked hard on the plot logic, and the result is even more unreasonable logic and more loopholes. For example, five perverts searched a small forest all over, step by step, how did the heroine escape? The police went to the forest park to find his daughter. The car was located some distance from the surrounding woods. The police was not far away. How did the heroine get into the back seat of the car without being spotted? She said she was always in the car. May not be found, and the woman doesn't have to wait for him to bluff and enter the car before she knocks him out. The means of revenge for women in the original version are seduction and bewitching, which can more or less offset the blunt transformation of women in front of sheep and tigers, but the means of revenge for women in the new version is only brute force. Very blunt. Yes, these villains have a lot of brains. Sexual seduction may not be effective, but the director can lay out more tricks on revenge. Whistleman and DV man are kind of interesting, and the other few have no energy at all. What's this era? Even if Mr. Chainsaw is waiting for a rookie, it can't be too far behind. How can you not let the original version lose a few positions?

The same is a remake of a banned film, and the Tomb and the Magic House are quite different in terms of influence, quality, money, and sincerity. Maybe the director is sincere, but he just didn't figure out his position.

View more about I Spit on Your Grave reviews