In fact, it's a movie that I only watched after watching a lot of movie reviews. I'm not afraid of spoilers, because no matter how much insider I've seen before, when the movie starts, I'm just waiting to be a "suffer".
After reading all of this, I feel that the screenwriter and director are awesome, and if nothing else, I don't have much depth, but aren't the director and screenwriter just writing stories and telling stories to everyone? The story is interesting to write and interesting to tell. The content of the entire film is fragmented, piece by piece, there are many idealistic and sci-fi places, and there are also "unreasonable" places that people don't want to pursue. But when I took it out and looked at it, I just thought it was good and interesting. Logic, content, plot arrangement, shot changes, even music, etc. I think the most awesome effect of a movie is that the blind jaguar drags for 150 minutes. After it's over, everyone doesn't want to go deep into these flaws. Obviously, I just closed my eyes and messed around, fooling around with a movie, and you all screamed and screamed after watching it, I was very happy, not awesome.
So, from this point of view, the director and the screenwriter did their own thing and enjoyed the blessings they had won, and I also did what I should have done and enjoyed the same. As for Depp... Do you think that all the roles that one gets, regardless of their social and occupational age, are all like a black-eyed gothic guy, and do you still care if fans say he "has no breakthrough"? !
Bold prediction: Depp's next character, no matter what the situation is, will become more and more spit-out attributes, more and more cold jokes, more and more in the direction of praise and black belly, and the lines will become less and less grammatical, and this product is absolutely absolute Doesn't change the style.
View more about The Lone Ranger reviews
