The thinking brought about by violence is revealed everywhere in the film, and everyone is inadvertently related to violence in some way. How should we deal with it? TOM's extreme approach seems to have no choice but is it worth understanding? It is actually the right way to leave this question to the reader at the end of the film. It represents people at different stages who make different choices. The wife who can best represent the reader's position is caught in contradiction and hesitation. But there are too many movies that end like this, and it feels a little lacking in novelty.
There is not much time for violent scenes in the film, but it can play the role of finishing touch, showing the theme and thinking brought by violence very well, which is natural and reasonable. When I think of the domestic blockbuster Huang Feihong I watched this year, I also want to express a simple theme: the spirit of martial arts, but the whole film is to pile up and show off the martial arts scene skills of Jet Li and Yuan Heping, plus some imposed slogans and preaching dialogues, this expression method It's really poor and crude by comparison.
Only a rigorous and real script can impress the audience. The characters in the history of violence are well portrayed. In addition, the details echo everywhere, with a little black humor. The combination of sensory stimulation and rational thinking is indeed a rare masterpiece.
View more about A History of Violence reviews
