It is still a work that needs to speculate hard on the original work that has not yet been read, and whether the unavoidable misreading is the core of the story, which in turn affects the stars and the two. It's the same dilemma as Dune, albeit with different strengths. At least the two keels that support the theme—the growth of the genius boy and the collision between different civilizations are clearly broken, and I can only vaguely see the arrogance when he stood upright. On the one hand, Ender's genius is not only a perfect balance of sensibility and rationality, but also a dual-card dual-standby of IQ and EQ, IQ and experience, and the character Huacai is simply unable to support the system evaluation of the full hexagon. For example, the most critical tactical planning and strategy response section, whether it is in the individual solo of the Salamander team or the formation of the flying dragon team as the central leader, has not given me any amazing operations that amaze me. In 1v2, the protagonist can of course make the whole team into a ball and one side can pass, can’t the alliance team fight violently and dismantle the shield? Offensive and defensive integrated network is a ghost)? The advantage in numbers and the experience of the veterans are considered frozen by the freezer gun, which is simply unreasonable. On the other hand, when Ender was bullied by his classmates, he judged that as long as he "wins and keeps winning", he can defend himself once and for all. When he is excluded by the team leader, he uses language to maximize the interests to induce the sensitive and excess self-esteem of the young people. These behaviors all radiate insight into human nature, they belong entirely to human beings, and they play with people’s hearts. Even if they look at the Vulcan machine’s ingenuity (not to mention), what gain is there in interpreting the combat laws of completely different intelligent races? The front foot of the work emphasizes that the Zerg attack has no rules and cannot be calculated, and the back foot Shi Shiran gave me the old punch of "there is a center (the queen of insects), destroy the Zerg and the whole army will collapse", and Ender's every move , every frown and smile must be invited to the colonel and the ship doctor to explain the singing and harmony like a comic dialogue, tsk tsk admiration, compared with the famous line in "The Legend of the Demon Cat": "Li Bai, the Tang Dynasty is amazing only if you have it". It's not even close to each other - the details of this little bit of detail all reduce the credibility of the work before the source (the coalition army recruits young children) and the back yuan (Ender defeats the Zerg). To sum up, it is really difficult for me to appreciate the growth of the young man in the main axis of the story. Does he have any ideas that have been gradually formed or repeatedly revised in his experience? "When I know my enemy well enough to defeat him, I love him" no, "more important than victory is the way of victory" no. He has always been. Taking these two statements out of thin air and savoring them out of thin air can also be called meaningful, but Andrew's life seems so vain. Finally, before critiquing the Dark Forest , can you tell me why the top leader of the Earth Alliance did not make a decision on the premise that the Zerg had not attacked for 50 years, instead of strictly guarding and developing himself, and accumulating strength every day, but taking the initiative to attack regardless of the cost. Complete annihilation or group annihilation and gamble on "ball" luck? Well, I don't think it's a moral issue. In contrast, if the queen of insects wanted to communicate with a race but only came to Ender, it could only be said to be a small flaw that was not clearly explained.
View more about Ender's Game reviews
