View more about Judgment at Nuremberg reviews
Reason is no match for emotion
Ernie 2021-12-30 17:21:44
The film persuaded me emotionally, but not logically. The trial is still entangled in whether Judy Garland is cheating and whether Montgomery Cliff is mentally retarded. In fact, it defaulted to the legitimacy of the Nazi law and avoided the question of whether it is guilty to comply with the draconian law. In the end, Lancaster's confession became a turning point in the film. It is not so much that Spencer Cusser tried Lancaster, but Lancaster tried himself. This is a moral trial, and it is illegal.
Extended Reading
-
Karson 2021-12-30 17:21:44
This is almost the greatest court scene ever, much better than the twelve angry men. As an indoor scene, the in-camera scheduling is very good, although I am very insensitive to jerking the scene. The script laid an extremely solid foundation for the film. From the superficial lines to the narrative structure to the deep-level scrutiny of legal ethics and politics, it is all painstaking work. All performances are accurate! It is necessary for Schell to shine, and several supporting roles are also very dazzling.
-
Nyasia 2021-12-30 17:21:44
The biggest crime of the Nazi Party in World War II was the genocide of millions of Jews. For this crime, the defense lawyers reasoned that these crimes were not committed by the four men sitting in the dock because they were just To complete their work, but the sin committed by the whole world against Hitler's connivance! In many cases, this is the best excuse for a bad person to exonerate himself! One thing is wrong, so the executor is also guilty
-
Hans Rolfe: The statement: "My country, right or wrong" was expressed by a great American patriot. It is no less true for a German patriot.
-
Emil Hahn: Today, you sentence me! Tomorrow, the Bolsheviks sentence you!