①First of all, if the old man's mind is still clear, it should be very painful to see that he has caused such a big trouble to the family. ②Although this conflict is not big, and it is a common example of ordinary petty citizen disputes, but because of this, it is really of universal significance, and the contradictions and phenomena in it are not uncommon, so the film is a rare realistic and delicate. ③ On the matter itself, I think both men are right, and the two women cannot understand. As for Nader, anyone would go crazy when they came home and saw their father tied to the bed and fell face down on the ground, but Nader's reaction was already very restrained. After driving out without handing over the keys, he opened the door and ran in again and again, and Nader later did it only to get her out of the door, not to beat or hurt her. Although he lied about whether Ryze was pregnant or not, in fact, it had almost nothing to do with this incident, and he didn't push her on purpose because she was pregnant. Does it matter if you know she's pregnant? If you can't touch it when you're pregnant, how can you make her go out obediently? It's so fragile, why don't you stay at home and run someone else's house as a servant? Plus, he was so angry, how could he remember, oh, the woman who tied my father to the bed and went out without permission, and maybe the woman who stole our family's money was pregnant? So, the question is not whether she is pregnant or not, if Nader beats her, even if she is not pregnant, he is breaking the law. As for Ruiz's husband, he was forced to be laid off by the shoe repair factory, and he lost the lawsuit for a whole year. He owed a lot of debt and was arrested in prison. He also heard that his wife was beaten by the employer and had a miscarriage, and his emotions were even more fueled. Sue the other party for an explanation, it would be better if there is compensation, just to solve the urgent need. There is nothing wrong with this way of thinking. The reactions and words and actions of the two men are normal, while the two women are very strange. Ryze, in fact, is also a poor woman. She is in a dilemma at home. She feels distressed by her husband and is under great pressure. But fortunately, if she wants to frame the other party and take the opportunity to solve the family's difficulties, it's fine, but since she doesn't want to get the money compensation for the sin that violates the teachings, why should she sue the other party with her husband? Why denounce the other party confidently, and what is the purpose? What do you want to get? Besides, why hide the fact of being hit by a car from everyone, even the husband? Wouldn’t it be more fair and reasonable to demand compensation from the other party for similar work-related injuries? After all, he was hit by a car while caring for his father. It's really hard to understand her motives.
And Westminster, I don't know what she has endured before, why is she so resolute? The old father kept talking about her name, and he should have loved her very much. Why did he ignore the old father so much? Immigrating for inexplicable reasons, saying that he forced his husband to leave his father in order to create a better environment for his daughter, is it plausible? Said his father doesn't remember Alzheimer's anyway? It's really abhorrent to have such a ridiculous idea. After the incident, he didn't care about her husband's feelings and right or wrong at all, and just rudely chose to calm down. After listening to Ryze's oral truth, he did not tell his family, but continued to make her husband wrong and pay compensation. Why is this? Do you sympathize with Ryze? Then what is your husband? By the way, I was going to get a divorce and complained that my husband didn't keep it. This old work is really speechless.
④The two of them are destined to divorce because their values are fundamentally different. In this matter, the husband cares more about the truth of the matter and whether he has caused direct harm to the miscarriage of the pregnant woman. He has repeatedly asked her whether the child in your belly was really lost because of me? And the wife doesn't care about the truth at all, doesn't care whether her husband is wronged or wronged, she just wants to solve the problem quickly, put things to rest and minimize the impact on the family. It can't be said that she is wrong, only that the two people's perspectives on solving problems are completely different. One might think she might not be a good wife, but at least she is a good mother. No, I don't think she is a good mother either. A good mother would not put her daughter in such a tangled and painful situation. A good mother would not ask the whole family to obey her decision for the sake of pursuing a so-called better environment. Wouldn't a good mother prefer to break up the family and get a divorce so that her daughter can get a better environment? She is just arbitrary, she makes a decision and everyone else has to agree.
⑤ The film uses the collision between two classes of families to trigger the contradictions of the story. In fact, it is a close-up. This society is full of such bumps. It seems that there are invisible airbags constantly inflating, compressing everyone's living space and rights. Everyone is reacting immediately in order to live and even survive. Running around, hoarse, mixed with half rationality and half emotion, dealing with things that are bound to get out of control.
⑥ It has always been emphasized that whether Nader knew about the pregnancy was of little significance in this event, but in this film, it is meaningful to mention or even promote the plot as the main plot. Because in our lives, we often find that sometimes, a certain point in the event, even a point that is extremely insignificant to the case, often dominates the emotions of bystanders, and is often used as the main material to judge the right of the two parties. wrong. There is always this kind of inexplicable dislocation in this society, which is worth emphasizing in the film.
If there are remarks such as "lie is no good", then this person, hehe, must be those keyboard warriors who usually hide behind the screen. A man who lives in mid-air.
⑦People need to have faith.
Add favorite viewpoints (invasion and deletion)
Ⅰ Escape and stay behind. When Nader raised his hand to his daughter on the court bench and swore, he also held up the soldier who was beside him. Those who choose to leave are free to leave. Those who chose to stay were hampered by a rigid and powerful system, a wonderful irony. Ⅱ Ryze and her husband, as people at the bottom, have no right to speak, no bargaining chips, and no expressive power to argue for themselves. When fighting for wages, things like "If I do a good job, can I add more? If you are not satisfied, you can not pay." The fight failed to get the other party's reconsideration. "My problem," says Ryze's husband, "is that I can't be as articulate as he is." As always, ordinary people are in a state of aphasia, and when they try to fight, they are powerless. Ⅲ The more powerless a person is, the more dependent he is on the power of faith. The Ryze family is devout. Even if the husband solves the problem in his own way, he still requires the tutor to swear according to the Koran. Nader proved himself through an experiment. Relying on secular rules. Ⅳ The Ryze family believes in religious morality, and the Nader family believes in personal morality. In the end, Ryze's husband chose to stick to the contradiction between reality and religious morality. Nader was originally a principled person, and in the face of huge costs, he chose to give up his principles.
View more about A Separation reviews
