the result is not a comedy

Rubye 2022-04-19 09:01:38

Before watching "A Farewell", I accidentally caught a glimpse of a related film review on the Internet, saying that Nader's father is a symbol of the Iranian regime... I can only say that as a pseudo-literary youth who has been concerned about firewood, rice, oil and salt recently, I don't want to and I don't have the ability to take it Elevated to the category of political films. In my opinion, the realism of everyday life is the best footnote to this film.
First, this film must be the love of detail control. Nader and Simin's occupation, family status, father-daughter relationship, mother-daughter relationship, the current living conditions and social status of Iranian women, and the importance of education to Iranian women are all drawn with fine brushes. Second, the old tune is repeated but it is suitable for the situation: there is no black and white, right or wrong. The nursing husband, who has been unemployed for a long time and suffered the loss of his son, has the opportunity to get a sum of money in a seemingly reasonable way. Nader's abacus is inevitable. Nader unbuttoned his shirt and buttoned it back while examining his father for blood stasis, saying "I'm not sure if the bruise was caused by a fall to the ground". Knowing that the bruises were conclusive evidence could allow him to successfully sue Reitz. In order to prevent my father from going to jail, my daughter gave perjury to the judge. If I were me, I might have made the same choice. A lot of things are impossible to judge right and wrong. 3. Nader couldn't help crying when he was cleaning his father. Westminster complained in tears while driving: "I asked for a divorce and he didn't even say refusal." Look at the precious things with your heart, and come to an unknown The tacit understanding is good, but this is only suitable for occasional. Feelings should be expressed when they should be expressed, otherwise there will be regrets. 4. Where did the money go? When I saw it, I thought it was Westminster who came back with some money, but there is no clue about the missing money after the whole movie. In fact, Nader and Reitz were arguing about two things: whether Reitz had stolen money, and she shouldn't have left his father alone. The latter is almost indisputable. Looking back, Nader's shoving was because Reitz insisted on arguing that he didn't steal the money, and she also said in court that, worse than losing her child, Nader slandered him for stealing money. No one followed up on the whereabouts of the money. It's so easy for people to be like this, and as soon as things develop, they forget what the original problem was, and then talk about it endlessly.
But it's not a good movie like that. The young people in literature and art have not eaten fireworks for a long time, and they occasionally see a movie with a little firework flavor. As for how excited they are.

View more about A Separation reviews

Extended Reading

A Separation quotes

  • Termeh: Didn't you say it's not serious?

    Nader: It got serious.

  • Simin: Does he even realize you are his son?

    Nader: I know he is my father!