love and freedom

Ashtyn 2022-04-20 09:01:19

The lawsuit itself - it won dignity for homosexuals and defended the "justice" that the United States advertised as "All men are created equal." Andrew became a fighter with a weak image, and the film attempts to explain such behavior as his belief in the law ——“you get to be part of justice being done.”, while further emphasizing “all men are created equal” from a legal and social perspective. Therefore, the focus of this film is a legal confrontation, as JOY emphasizes, "But a law's been broken, okay? The law. Remember the law?" Although the shadow of morality and ethics has always pervaded, but everyone We all know that the victory of a lawsuit does not necessarily lead to moral and ethical approval. The film attempts to show rational respect for homosexuality rather than emotional acceptance. Although JOY's last moving appearance has injected more warmth into the film, I think it does not go deep into the moral and ethical level in the discussion of homosexuality, but avoids the important ones. So we saw an ANDREW who was actually very lucky. He got the support of his family, he could hire his own lawyer, and he had a lover who never left.

And many homosexuals, whether they have AIDS or not, are in a constant state of anxiety - and the emotional world without social recognition is like a jungle that has not been comforted by the sun for a long time, often disorganized. Perhaps the first thing that homosexuals need to solve is their own psychological inferiority - guilt, inferiority complex, helplessness... and the understanding and acceptance of those around them who really have a relationship with them. When ANDREW's mother said, "I can't imagine there is anything, that anyone could say, that would make us feel less proud of you." I thought it meant more than this lawsuit. In our lifetime, we know only 3,000 people (ordinary people), and only a few hundred people have an impression. How many people can you remember his phone number and his birthday? Can get the approval of the close relatives, die without regrets.

ANDREW became a fighter because he deeply knew that homosexuality was acceptable - with enough understanding, tolerance and love. Such hope gave him the courage to fight for his dignity and his own interests when he felt that homosexuality had to be accepted. What he chooses to face at the end of his life is a return for love, allowing more people to face the issue of homosexuality, and being understood is a means of gaining recognition. This is the last look, longing, worship of freedom, of life.

However, nothing can fill his thirst for life. When you look at yourself a little bit by the disease and go to death, the truth and preciousness of life cannot be expressed, and the concealment of the past becomes powerless and ridiculous. What ANDREW hopes to win from the lawsuit is not only the legal rights of homosexuality, but also the society's attention, understanding, and acceptance of this group of people. What he really wants to embrace is not high compensation, but an air of endless love and freedom.

My favorite part was when he listened and told an opera under the eerie red light, so obsessed, so relaxed...


"It was during that sorrow that
love came to me!

A voice filled with harmony
That said.. .
Live still, I am Life!"

"I am the god that descends
From the heavens to the earth
To make of the earth
A heaven!"


"I am Oblivion!
I am Glory!
I am Love, Love, Love!"

View more about Philadelphia reviews

Extended Reading
  • Kirstin 2022-03-21 09:01:25

    I cried "I AM LOVE!"

  • Nels 2022-03-21 09:01:25

    At the beginning, I was attracted by the director, and I was attracted by the two movie stars in the rest of the time. The rhythm was tepid, and there was no contrived Hollywood movie at all (the court victory is very realistic and wonderful)

Philadelphia quotes

  • Belinda Conine: [Defense opening statement] fact: Andrew Beckett's performance on the job varied from competent to good, to often times mediocre, to sometimes flagrantly incompetent fact: he claims he's the victim of lies and deceit, fact: it was Andrew Beckett who lied, going through lengths to conceal his disease from his employers, fact: Andrew Beckett was successful in his duplicity, the partners at Wyatt Wheeler did not fire Andrew Beckett because he had AIDS fact: Andrew Beckett is dying fact: Andrew Beckett is angry because his lifestyle, his reckless behavior has cut short his life and in his anger, in his rage he is lashing out and he wants someone to pay

  • Joe Miller: [Plaintiff opening statement] ladies and gentlemen of the jury: forget everything you've seen on television and in the movies. There's not going to be any last minute surprise witnesses, nobody's going to break down on the stand with a tearful confession, you're going to be presented with simple facts. Andrew Beckett was fired and you'll two explanations on why he was fired, ours and theirs it's up to you to sit through layer upon layer of truth until you determine for yourself which version sounds the most true. There's certain points I must prove to you: point number one: Andrew Beckett was... is a brilliant lawyer, a great lawyer, point number two: my client afflicted with a disabling disease made the understandable, the personal, and the legal choice to keep the fact of his illness to himself point number three: his employers discovered his illness and ladies and gentlemen the illness I'm referring to is AIDS point number four: they panicked and in their panic they did what most would do which is just get "it" and everybody who has "it" as far as away as possible, the behavior of my client's employers seem reasonable to you, it does to me, after all AIDS is a deadly incurable disease but no matter how you come to judge Charles Wheeler and his partners in ethical and moral and inhuman terms, the fact of the matter is when they fired Andrew Beckett because he has AIDS they broke the law.