When Tom Hanks was a little fresh meat, he acted very well in this movie. After watching this film, the most direct gain is to understand how civil litigation in the United States is generated and carried out, especially the court investigation, defense, the role of the judge, the role of the jury, the way witnesses testify, and the judgment, They are all very classics and have seen the publicity of civil laws in Western countries. Democracy is empty talk without just laws. Without effective procedures, the law is a pile of waste paper. The theme of the film revolves around discrimination against AIDS patients, and strives for the right to employment of AIDS patients through legal means. It involves all aspects of society, family, marriage, friendship, employment, and reflects the ethical challenges encountered by human beings in the process of social changes. New ethics and new relationships impact tradition and people's cognition. Homosexuality is another main line of the film. There is a lot of writing and writing. It objectively faces this social phenomenon and does not avoid dodging. Although people have become accustomed to AIDS, homosexuality, etc., and have a clear understanding, but this film, shot in the 1990s, reflected AIDS on the screen for the first time, which had a positive impact on people's cognition and had a certain Times. It's a classic movie that deserves to be watched by more people.
View more about Philadelphia reviews
