First of all , this film really pokes me. I g-pointed dystopia
and the discussion of marriage and love can be even better? To form a couple, if a single person moves to a hotel within 45 days, if they fail to form a couple, they will be forcibly turned into an animal. The most basic standard of this system is marriage, and the most basic standard of marriage is similarity The similarities don't make sense, they both study social science, they both play the piano, they're both short-sighted, they're both indifferent, they both have nosebleeds for no reason, blablabla, which is probably the reason why people get married in the real world, and why are we together because The real feelings are these inexplicable commonalities and what is the relationship between feelings and commonalities? What is the meaning of marriage? The point in the film is that two people are accompanied by themselves, but this is a nonsense point. With the company of a spouse, people will not go out. Being raped, choking on food, not choking to death, you can put Daddy's ointment on your back where you can't reach, in this system where marriage is the standard, all other moral laws are weakened or can't be used at all. It 's a world of marriage for marriage's sake. Lobster eschews discussions of some traditional marriage-related things like sexuality, children, etc. As long as there is marriage, gender isn't a problem. Sex can't be done individually. It is completed by two people and the child is the product of adjusting the marriage. In real life, the marriage that people pursue is still the marriage they think of, or is it just an empty box of marriage. So in this world, it is just like what the hotel manager said. Animals have nothing to fear
Because animals can basically do things that humans can do, except that they can't read books or watch movies, etc.
But who cares? After all, as long as you can find a companion, life is complete
. The handful of rebels in dystopian movies
they don't agree with the existing system and create a completely opposite rule
there can't be any love in their world even flirting will be punished harshly
that's me The reason why I especially like this film is not only from the perspective of dystopia, but also from the perspective of marriage and feelings.
They have no idea of overthrowing the existing system, even if they have countless opportunities,
no revolution, no war, no bloodshed , on the
contrary women The leader just created this completely opposite world as if trying to prove something.
The world is not chicken soup and it is not free
. She questions the current system, but she is, in a sense, the one who buys the most into it.
She regularly periodically I went to visit my parents and pretended to be a normal life, but there is no real relationship in this world.
Marriage does not need the foundation of the family, nor does it need the foundation of the relationship, but she is the one who really gives her feelings.
She doesn't want revolution . To rule she just wants to prove what she thinks
She proves to the manager and the couple that their so-called marital relationship is just a weak lie
She blinds the female lead (though I don't think so) to prove to her that the male lead has feelings for her It's not true
, so in a sense, under her icy expression is the obsession and belief in feelings that are almost desperate.
View more about The Lobster reviews
