1.
The Public Enemy of the State is a movie from 1998. The old movie from ten years ago should actually be more tolerant to you. Besides, I still love Smith's main character.
In addition, I also know that although the title of Public Enemy of the State is big, the protagonist is a rookie except for American law.
Unlike the protagonist of Bournement, who is a former amnesia agent, his ability is too great to change the day.
And, from an objective point of view when making a movie.
The world situation in 1998 was different from that in 2002. The eavesdropping and anti - terrorist technology in 2002 was far inferior to that in 2002. After all, there
was a 9.11 between them. Worse than the above. If The Spy Movie makes you reluctant to go to the toilet, then the public enemy of the country can simply watch it in two days (I am like this...) The action, plot, and details are much less attractive. 2. What about the content of the expression. The Bourne Bounds expresses the amnesia agent's pursuit of his past in a cool way; it shows various tracking, anti-tracking, anti-terrorism, and human transformation methods; the gaps between various factions within the National Security Agency ; and a story of "the mantis catching the cicada and the oriole behind" and the public enemy of the state has a key word, civic privacy. This is directly ignored in The Bourne Bourne – not only can all the information files of domestic citizens be easily retrieved and eavesdropped on and monitored, the NSA’s methods have even been clever enough to obtain the information of any foreign citizen. Anyway, you can always find you on this earth and know what you had for lunch. Although not legally allowed so proceed with caution. But morally, there is no bottom line at all. It can be said that one can do whatever it takes to complete the task.
The public enemy of the state expresses a moral struggle between the legal system and the government in "eavesdropping and protecting citizens' privacy". That's why candidates who disagree with the Privacy Act are killed, and that's why there are "public enemies" that endanger a very small number of "nations". It can be seen from this... that people from many years ago were a little bit kinder than they are now... or just incapable of doing worse things.
3.
Narrative means.
The Spy Shots are neatly interlocking and climaxing one after another, which is not a compliment. And music plays an important role in it. People who have seen the movie believe that Matt's face and movie clips will come to mind as soon as the main melody sounds.
The public enemy of the country is a little procrastinated, and even think that some scenes are very procrastinated. Things that can be understood in a flash have to be shaken for half a minute. It wastes time and makes people impatient to continue. go. This is far inferior to Spy Shots. Also, music. No impressive soundtrack or melody at all. The well-known music is an indispensable prop to set off the atmosphere, and this prop is completely wasted in the public enemy of the country. Or I'm too slow.
4. Jason Bourne, played by the
protagonist
Matt Damon, needless to say. Too cool. Powerful and technical, calm and alert, neat and persevering.
Compared to him, Will Smith's Dean is stupid. The old man wasn't very popular either, as I can tell from the fact that I don't remember their names at all.
5.
In short, Public Enemy of the State is probably a film worth watching, and there are probably many bright spots that I haven't discovered yet, and maybe I'm just a person who likes to watch the fun.
But give Enemy of the Nation 3 stars on top of 6 stars in The Bourne Age.
It's my fault to compare you guys together.
View more about Enemy of the State reviews
