See the movie from an unconventional angle

Candace 2022-04-20 09:01:20

The playback of the HD movie of Sweet Fruit Time made me revisit this classic again. . . So I read everyone's reviews. All kinds of prism gates, the United States preaches freedom but it is so dark, and then there will always be people who will remember to black out our great heaven (there is no democracy at all, there can be no such film.) (Since you hate this country so much, you should jump off the building , and see if you can go to your paradise America in your next life. . . In the first half of the film, the protagonist comes home, his wife is watching TV, and when he talks about the Privacy Act, his attitude at that time is: I think he is quite right. That is to say, his position at the time was in favor, because from an objective point of view, this kind of surveillance did indeed play a relatively large role in national security. In addition, he is a small civilian and has nothing to do with such incidents. . . And then the shitty spies, the self-righteous yellow-lens technicians, started to ruin his life. His life was all ruined. . . The plot of the door-to-door, the self-righteousness of the technician, made the audience very unhappy with this person. As a lawyer, Smith's behavior of defending his rights was described as guilty by him, which naturally pushed this group of people to the opposite of the protagonist, the villain. . . If the protagonist is a technician from the National Security Bureau, answering such a person in this way, and then analyzing it in this way, the audience will only think that he is so awesome. . . OK, go ahead. During the period, the various high-tech methods of the National Security Bureau forced the protagonist to have nowhere to go, and even aroused the audience's disgust with this lack of privacy. . . In fact, if we hadn't known in advance that the protagonist was innocent, we might applaud their powerful tracking methods and the installation of monitors for their meticulous observation of the protagonist's wear. . . Through the killing short film, the political darkness was exposed and the villain continued to be shaped. . . Then there is the protagonist's counterattack. At the end of the film, he sees the smile of the old man questioning the bill. . . Yes, he was on the opposite side of what he identified with in the first place. Because he experienced this terrifying tracking technology firsthand, the technology that violated his technology and forced him to a dead end. When people's interests are violated, his response is on the side of his own interests. Maybe it's a bit far-fetched for me to say that, but if he's not the protagonist, can we say he's actually a bit selfish? . . . For his benefit, scandals were exposed, preventing the establishment of a bill to maintain national security. Of course, with the reason to hunt him down just to cover up the scandal, viewers wouldn't think that way either. . . This reminds me of the ending of the game "The Last of Us", the protagonist Joel destroyed the hope of mankind for the little girl's protagonist not to die (the little girl has antibodies against zombie viruses, but if you extract the antibodies, she will die Lose). Seems a bit silly. . . . . . . . . . . . . When it comes to everyone's privacy, to be honest, things like the prism door are actually not well known? It's just that someone has told the truth, and people seem to feel that their rights have been violated and that they are insecure, so they all blame. . . . . Although this kind of technological crisis is terrifying, and it will also give opportunities to people with ill-conceived ideas, but who would be so bored all day turning over something like a passer-by. . . . . . . Being pitted, unconvinced, and opposed to this technological invasion. Not being pitted, I think it is a distant thing, and it is also for national security, and it has nothing to do with it. . . . Humans are such contradictory creatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . Another word. For any website, use the user's account and password registered on his website to log in to other websites. How many people will be recruited. . . Privacy, before it is made public, he is still private

View more about Enemy of the State reviews

Extended Reading
  • Marlen 2022-04-21 09:01:30

    Thinking of Snowden's leak of the US government's eavesdropping incident, it seems that the "prophecy" of the movie has come true~ The situation in China may be worse, and there is no parliament, so we don't know what the government wants to monitor~ Of course, surveillance has advantages and disadvantages , it still depends on who is in control~ The last paragraph is a great plan to let the Security Bureau and the Mafia blackmail! Very humorous, the donkey's lips on both sides are not the horse's mouth, but the words are on the right side, wonderful! Give five stars to this ending!

  • Bridie 2022-03-22 09:01:23

    I'm not saying that this Public Enemy is really bullshit. A group of satellites tracking all kinds of high-tech National Intelligence Agency personnel can't even stop a stupid big man, even if they are about to be dispatched by sea, land and air, but they are lost. Isn't this obviously delaying the plot? Disappointed with such a high rating. Don't talk about the humanitarian words of state control like chicken blood.

Enemy of the State quotes

  • Robert Clayton Dean: He said his name was Brill.

    Brill: He said it, or you said it and he picked up on it?

    Robert Clayton Dean: [pause] Oh shit, I said it.

  • Jamie Williams: Ooh, sensitive.