Dictatorship, or dictatorship, is far more effective than democracy in special periods, while democracy is better in relatively ordinary times. Therefore, there is nothing absolutely correct in this world. Everything has a prerequisite, and everything has a reference. The reason why mankind is sad is to find an unsuccessful panacea. As a result, it will inevitably be self-defeating.
The tragedy in the film is not caused by the wave. The wave is only an indirect condition. The prerequisite for the child to commit suicide is because of the family. At this time, something that can entrust his soul suddenly appears and then disappears immediately. There is a psychological defect for this. The people are a fatal blow. In the film, the thing he puts in it is only presented as a so-called autocratic organization. What if he puts love in it at this time? Is it work? Is it a hobby? So can we say that love is not good, work is not right, and hobbies are not suitable? This does not need to be answered.
Whether we want democracy or dictatorship, the prerequisite must depend on the current environment and all objective factors. There is nothing in this world that is done once and for all, and there is no one-stop method. Without the prerequisite, everything is useless.
In fact, needless to say, those democrats who watched this film almost all fell into a situation of selective blindness, and did not notice the mockery of democracy and freedom. The reason why I gave one star is not because the film is not good, but just to attract a little attention. In fact, I can give four stars. From the perspective of the whole film, the director and screenwriter of this film are very clever. They have 50 big boards for democracy and autocracy, and they also have 50 silver medals. This is the film's. The true essence, I don’t see this. The carnival of these democratic madmen is just another democratic dictatorship, an dictatorship of democracy, don’t you think it’s interesting, hehe.
In addition, someone might attack my shield with my spear. Since I said that there is no absolutely right thing in this world, then what I said is not absolutely right?
It looks good, but in reality, I have added a premise to my conclusion, that is, under certain objective conditions, there is absoluteness, within a certain framework, it can be absolute, and outside this framework, it is not. And are the objective conditions absolute? All things and everything are not changing rapidly? Therefore, the objective conditions are not absolute. If you have to clarify this circle, then there is only one sentence, that is, absolute is not absolute, and non-absolute is absolute.
View more about The Wave reviews
