history. Regarding the history of World War II, to be honest, the entire modern history, whether it is Chinese history or world history, I have learned in a mess. I just like ancient history, and I hate airplanes and cannons. Therefore, in addition to knowing that Hitler was a paranoid, I really don't know that there is such a history of assassinating Hitler. Obviously the assassination was unsuccessful, because I still know that the lunatic committed suicide. In the assassination named Valkyrie, the central character is Colonel Stauffenberg played by Tom. The film is said to be an attempt to name the one-eyed Colonel because of what Churchill described as "dog bites dog". The film is indeed very successful in shaping the Colonel into an image like a tragic hero in Wagner's opera. It doesn't really matter whether this incident in history is just or a farce. The struggle between the old aristocrats and the Nazi upstarts is a conspiracy theory. Like you know, the overthrow of an old government and the establishment of a new government, without changing the medicine, has never been fully appreciated in history textbooks. Including this movie, which is trying to praise, can't help but show the uncertainty and suspicion of this group of coup fighters about the future: will the war end if Hitler is dead; who will come to power if Hitler is dead? Could it be worse? Everything that is said is for justice, for ideals, for peace, and for the people. Whether the people appreciate it or not is another matter. It is more or less paranoid to say that such people will do whatever it takes for their ideals and justice. Hitler didn't mean to be so bad, he just had something wrong in his brain. So it's not wrong to say dog bites dog. Whether the colonel is a bad guy or not is not the point. What the movie wants us to see is that he is a brave man, a man of decision, and a man of faith. It's hard to say such people in real life, but they can still be admired in movies.
deduction. Could this be considered a historical film? In my eyes, except for documentaries, other films are entertainment interpretations, no matter what type of script they are. All with the potential for bullshit. If you really want to see the history of World War II, discuss the history of World War II, and review the history of World War II, please turn to the Central 10 Science and Education Channel~ What if it is made up? I just assumed it was made up - totally ignorant of real historical events ~ well acted. I think. The rhythm of the film is very strong, there is no wordy at all, Ka Ka Ka Ka is very neat, just like the army boots of the uniforms stomping the floor. There is a degree of relaxation, and he clearly knows that the result of the assassination is a failure, but he is still nervous, relieved, hopeful, and disappointed. It can only be said that the director's way of playing with the audience is very strong... The disadvantage is that the rhythm is too fast. In the middle of the night, my reaction is relatively slow and I have to go back and watch it again. On the other hand, the shaping of the characters will be weaker, and the audience's feelings for the characters will be very weak.
good. The uniform is handsome, the military boots are handsome, and the blond hair is handsome~ I like the little adjutant of Ah Tang very much. Of course, there are a lot of good-looking worthy of drooling in the play, you can take a glimpse. The biggest advantage of this film is that each actor is very flavorful, making people feel that they are not stiff, dramatic, and endearing. Whether they are old actors, German handsome guys, or original handsome guys, they all have their own roles. And the task is done very well! Um!
But this film has one of the most awkward places, that is, it is completely American. It's just an American story in a German package. German shooting is definitely not like this, German shooting is definitely deeper, more complex, more literary, more layered. The American narrative method is more than gimmicky, with little connotation. So American, it's not just a matter of language. An American guy like Tom, even if he speaks German, has a Hollywood accent. It seems to have dug into something very deep, struggling, hesitating, making decisions, and sinking the boat, but they are all superficial, and you will feel that this group of people has nothing to worry about after a while. This is a pity.
Supplement: Yesterday, I was sleepy and confused, and found that there was one place that I didn't talk about. When I was watching this video yesterday, during the armed coup, I found that during the coup, the soldiers on the front line didn't know what they were going to do. Those old guys did whatever they asked, and they didn't know until the end. What are they going to do? The inexplicable troops who participated in the coup became the main task - hero or sinner~ So I think, these big men, the so-called military power in their hands, will they occasionally fall into the virtuality of military power and the entity of soldiers. What about the contradictory philosophical thinking? When I see the coup, I think of "Heroes of the Galaxy", and when I think of Reinhardt's constitutional monarchy's internal palace reform and Yang Weili's democratic republic's military coup suppression, it's relatively high~
View more about Valkyrie reviews
