In order to make it look easier, we generally assume the first case. And although the real murderer Timmy did fake his death later, he actually did not take advantage of this to continue killing people in the hotel, but let the rest of the people kill each other. And this is often the smartest part of the killer in this mode.
2. Suspicious people are not necessarily murderers (people who have been overinterpreted as obviously suspicious are definitely not murderers), on the contrary, people who are not murderers are not necessarily innocent. So we may discover a lot of truth along the way, but we need to know clearly whether this truth is what we want. So even if we find out that one of them has done something heinous, as long as we can't be sure that he killed someone, he is not our murderer. These distracting factors, seemingly unrelated, can often cause us to forget the simplest facts and make wrong judgments.
For example, Rhodes had no chance of killing Timmy's mother.
3. Believe what you see and do the simplest and most reliable reasoning. Grab the certainty out of all the uncertainties and put it to good use.
Since George's death was part of a premeditated plan and not an accident, the only person who had a chance to kill George was Timmy - he killed him in front of everyone.
Likewise, Timmy's mother's death only Timmy had time to commit the crime.
4. The effect of multiple personalities and mental worlds on rigor.
Personally, I don't think the impact is big, it's just a simplification of motivation. Timmy, as the main character to some extent, should know that this is a battle for the right to exist, so there is no need for any reason to kill everyone—— In addition, in the reasoning works, no one really cares about motivation or anything, at most it is just dessert after dinner.
The fact that the corpses disappeared does act as a smoke bomb, so we can't tell whether the two people in the explosion have disappeared as corpses or not at all.
Another possibility is that the physical problem of whether a child can kill an adult male or put a baseball bat in someone's mouth is the real problem, but this kind of thing is like "why can a pawn in chess eat a elephant" I don't want to discuss the issue.
Another thing to mention is that there is no difference between the laws of the psychological world and the real world. Everyone lives a completely independent and realistic life. The only thing that shows that this is the psychological world may be the encounter of these people, and this is the effect of drugs. the result of.
5. To suggest.
Timmy's encounter has a clear resemblance to the childhood shadow of the murderer River in the beginning.
View more about Identity reviews
