Why doesn't a screenwriter think of creating a new supporting role?
Let the supporting role be bruised all over the body, so cool, such as Gerald Butler.
The scars all over his body will be shown when he takes a bath, bathing and drinking, pouring wine on his body, and the wine flows down the scar.
Then let him sleep for 2 hours at a time and rest for more than 20 hours. Dreaming is under his own control, he can fight and escape with Freddy every time, and then make Freddy unable to dominate.
Then add a group of rookies to the film, the kind of must-have, beauty + handsome + fat model.
The bloody ones first die 1 or 2, and finally a fat man + 1 pair of men and women are left alive. In the historical records, the supporting role is found (creating a myth of dog blood, a story about nightmares and anti-nightmare killers), and then Create a plot while chasing and killing.
In the final end, when the macho was about to sacrifice himself to rescue the three people, the three escaped, awakened first, and then awakened the macho by the XX method (the director is asked to think about it by himself, all kinds of heavy tastes, etc.) . Finally, he also pulled the macho from the last moment, and then there was a scar on the macho and so on.
Consider the ending of the sequel. When the hunk came out, Freddy's paw was brought out. . . . So the viewer will consider whether we are in a dream or not. . . Pay tribute to Nolan again, the camera is zoomed out, a top spinning on the table in the room, before it stops, it ends, and the subtitles are played.
View more about A Nightmare on Elm Street reviews
