Even so, the film just fell into another issue that people criticized: if the film wants to restore the silent film, why does it lose the charm of the silent film? Movies can be said to remind the audience lightly and eloquently all the time: the era of silent films is gone forever, but the artistic value of silent films will always exist, just like the great artist George Valentine in the film, After the baptism of time, the talent remains undiminished. Ingenious conception and intelligent "dialogue", "The Artist" also uses the word "black and white silent film" branded on itself, which is exactly the same as the plot in the film to prove that art does not exist outdated, this is probably the content of "The Artist" 's authenticity.
If you study whether "The Artist" is a 100% restoration of the silent film era, digging into the flaws of technology, disputing the heroine's eyebrows, and lamenting the poor copying, the viewer may really fall into the situation of the great artist in the film: too obsessed with that In the 1990s, he was obsessed with the weight of the word "silent film", but ignored the development of film as an artistic carrier. How can the film technology of the 21st century be the same as the silent film technology of the year? Film is only a carrier of art. The black-and-white film of the film, the live-action capture up to now, the film is still a film, and it is still a time machine where we put down our sorrows in front of the screen and fascinate them.
Rather than saying that "The Artist" is an Acura tribute to the art of silent film, it is better to say that it is an encounter and reunion between us and silent film. It is about love, the mole that George put on for Pepi, the tear that Pepi shed when he saw a lonely George in the car, and the one that George held tightly in the fire, so beautiful The Encounter of Light and Shadow.
View more about The Artist reviews
