Watched Star Trek 3 last night and came to write a review this morning. To be honest, I'm not an interstellar fan, and I haven't watched the super-long old TV series, but I still understand its story setting and history. What I'm interested in is that the power of the Enterprise was initially set to be antimatter fuel, and it's really a sci-fi predecessor/praise to have such an idea in the 1960s. Although Beyond the Stars does a good job of paying tribute to the birth of Star Trek on the 50th anniversary, it is the work of the director of Fast and Furious, and it actually exudes a familiar atmosphere. It is more like an action adventure than a sci-fi movie. The sci-fi setting remains the same. As for the rock song in the final battle, Breaking the Bee Swarm may indeed be very entertaining in front of the public, and it also creates a relaxed and pleasant atmosphere. But I have to say that for people who love sci-fi, this is bullshit/smile, and I won't complain too much out of respect for the classics.
For Paramount, which has now been reduced to relying on sequels for a living, classics can never be squeezed out. But even by paying tribute to the classics and the support of fans. In the eyes of non-Interstellar fans, it is just a sequel with bland content and nothing new to say. The old-fashioned villain setting, the clichéd plot, can only rely on the director's "passion" and special effects and the actors to call this movie.
The last thing I want to complain about is to change the setting of Sulu to gay. To be honest, when I saw Sulu getting off the fleet and seeing his boyfriend and daughter, I believe many people thought it was his brother/smile, and how did John play Sulu? It seems that they are all straight men (what's the matter with being a straight man? /Smile), it seems a bit "politically correct" to forcefully add GLBT elements in the new series of movies. (the one in the yellow dress)
View more about Star Trek Beyond reviews
