There are many Star Trek TV series and movies, and the constructed worldview is very clear, but forget all of these, just watch this movie or the new three movies, and "let's talk about it."
First of all, I haven't watched all the Star Trek series, so I don't have to use facts from other places to refute it, just evaluate it as a passerby. Enter the text:
This movie has a foreshadowing and details as a whole. Although there are some incomprehensible parts in the plot, it is still a good movie. There are three foreshadowings or foreshadowings in the single opening: the first is ancient weapons. Many people should think that the meaning of writing this paragraph is to emphasize the characteristics of the Interstellar Federation-peace and exploration. Also to elicit this weapon; the second is Ambassador Spike's death and his relics and Kirk's promotion to lieutenant general (Ambassador Spike's business card (tombstone?) The time on the ambassador's travel time is the "birth" time, Emphasizes the individual identity of Spike's ambassador); there are also small points about Kirk's father, who is the same identity, in contrast to Carl.
Let’s talk about what many people think are not good – the plot, let’s talk about it first, those who pursue the correct reality of science and technology, please watch the documentary, this is just a novel, it’s imaginative, and it’s all there is to say. First of all, the Enterprise was destroyed again and again, and was directly dismembered. Many people were wondering why it was so weak. Well, let's but for this one, the movie gives a lot of hints. The Enterprise is an exploration starship, and the Interstellar Federation is the main Peace and exploration, while Carl's predecessor was a retired soldier, his temperament changed and his belligerent nature broke out. His "bee" battleship was aggressive. Whether it was in quantity or in nature, it was reasonable for the Enterprise to be instantly defeated, and it is said in the movie. These technologies are left by the aborigines, and their technology level is not as good as that of the Federation (you can refer to the weapons and longevity of the Carl Legion); the other is a chain explosion. When the best songs sounded from space, the bees exploded in an instant chain explosion. This is really a bug. It may be that the director wanted to create a cool scene, but unfortunately the response was not good, and people who watched the movie seriously did not buy it. I won't go into details elsewhere
At the end, Carl's identity also deepens the film's idea; Spike's ambassador's relics are exposed - a photo, a group photo that everyone is familiar with, but to a certain extent, Kirk Spike's heart disease is solved and a tribute to the "senior". Kirk's birthday, from the beginning of only the two doctors drinking to the last group of people to celebrate the birthday, is it not a change of mood. There is a small detail. The "little" human (animal?) who followed Kirk back to the spaceship at the beginning of the movie also appeared at the end, but it has changed from the violent beginning to the kindness, which also shows the central idea of the Federation - peace!
So, as far as this movie is concerned, it is very good. Although there are some flaws and commercial routines, it is still a good sci-fi work.
There are many translations of the names in the ps text, so don't be too tangled
View more about Star Trek Beyond reviews
