But after seeing so many people giving five stars and four stars, I personally think that good friends are naive in themselves?
There are several reasons why I think this film is so ordinary:
First, the major premise: these people are all for money. This group itself, who is willing to take risks for the sake of money, is not representative of human nature.
Second, considering the first point, it is not surprising that these events happened to these people.
Third, considering the second point, there are still some plots that are too abrupt in the director's arrangement. Especially the change of the prison guard representative and the change of the relationship between this person and No. 77 were too abrupt.
Fourth, everyone who was very serious was observing the rules, which showed the rigor of this experiment, and finally the life-making side became a little more comical. It's like a farce, not an experiment, or a game of death.
Fifth, imagine that if you are the prison police, or the criminal, you will definitely use your brain instead of silly direct violence or use violence to stop violence. Throughout the storyline, I don’t see people who use their brains to deal with relationships.
To sum up, after watching the whole film, I personally think that some of the plots are very attractive, but the whole seems to be a lot of shortcomings.
---------------------------Supplement ----------------
After watching Stanford seriously After the prison experiment material, I added two points. The first is that this film is excessively exaggerated and modified the real experiment. It can be said that the changes are not good and very abrupt. I also understand why I think it is funny. Because the director wanted to present humanity according to real experiments, but he added a lot of artificial ideas to it. So funny.
The second is the harvest, that is, to understand the film from one side, it may be better to feel the true humanity, that is, for example, eight prison guards, maybe two of them are very "perverted" but they will damage the other five. Colleagues who have no tendency to attack. This is also one of the conclusions of the Stanford Prison Experiment:
"Under certain social circumstances, good people can also commit atrocities."
This change of character is what he calls "- Lucifer Effect
attached:
based on their discovery in the Stanford Prison Experiment and the Abu Ghraib prison, Jin Ba Duoti out of the three elements of people, the environment and institutions that and How these three interact to drive good people to do evil. Here we see the idiosyncratic theory of evil (human), the environmental theory of evil (environment), and the addition of Zimbados after examining the Abu Ghraib prison incident. The third element is the background (system) in which humans and the environment coexist. "When I read the report about the Abu Ghraib Prison, I wondered who created this environment of evil," he Recall, "The system is a bigger barrel: the legal, economic, historical, and political power that establishes such an environment. Most systems have a shell and there is no transparency at all. "
View more about The Experiment reviews
