-
Kelli 2022-03-27 09:01:18
"19th century detective sisters, never separated"
As the first film introduced in 2016, the Shenxia theatrical version has completed its task in a satisfactory manner, giving candy to fans. It has its own lines and mediocre plots, connecting the key points of the third and fourth seasons. , Okay, that's it, anyway, it was originally a work for...
-
Adelle 2022-03-28 09:01:09
Please let me complain silently (spoiler)
Go straight to the topic and spit a wave of grooves. . . .
The preface (promotional film) of the opening film will
not mention 1. When Holmes looked back and saw Watson when he was whipping the corpse, Watson was already standing still, so how did he infer Watson's occupation! Magic!
2. What the...
-
Keegan 2022-03-19 09:01:07
The reasoning of the case is getting more and more watery
-
Geovanny 2022-04-01 09:01:13
I haven't watched the original episode, nor am I interested in watching it. Just watch it purely as an independent movie, basically it can't be a story and it must be supported by the plot of the original book and TV series. Maybe that's what the movie was meant to be, but it wasn't satisfactory to me. The picture is not particularly delicate, and many transitions are simply inexplicable. The only gain is that after watching it, I feel that Master Que's face doesn't seem to be that long.
-
Dr. John Watson: [talking about his wife, Mary] Where did she go? She's always out these days.
Jane: Not unlike yourself... sir.
Dr. John Watson: I'm sorry?
Jane: Just observing, sir.
Dr. John Watson: Well, that's quite enough; nobody asked you to be observant.
Jane: Sorry, sir, I just meant you are hardly ever home together anymore, sir.
Dr. John Watson: You are dangerously close to impertinence. I shall have a word with my wife to have a word with you.
Jane: [with a bit irony] Very good, sir. And when will you be seeing her?
-
[Holmes' telegram to Watson: "COME AT ONCE IF CONVENIENT. IF INCONVENIENT, COME ALL THE SAME. HOLMES."]
