Dirty Harry

Blaze 2022-03-21 09:01:41

Watching the 1971 cop thriller Dirty Harry at a time when feminism and anti-racism become increasingly mainstream is indeed a nerve-racking experience. Directed by the earlier B-movie director Don Siegel, the 102-minute film, which portrays the cat-and -mouse-chase of a San Francisco police...

Destini 2021-11-14 08:01:23

From the perspective of film production in the new century, I do feel that the tense is not enough and the picture is not very good, but the legal background that unfolded after an hour and ten minutes has suddenly given the core and soul of the story. The previous series of active...

Damion 2022-04-22 07:01:09

I really want to know when the first gangster policeman appeared on film and television. Harry is definitely not the first, nor will he be the most handsome one. Eastwood's most iconic image was left on the open field, with the city's regulations trapping him. The biggest attraction of this film is actually the conflict between research method and emotion.

Winnifred 2022-04-23 07:01:41

Crime and punishment San Francisco in the 1970s was too monotonous compared to today. San Francisco without neon wine green without colorful colors would not be San Francisco. The old cowboy jumped from a shabby and dead small town cowboy to a city policeman with busy streets and high-rise buildings. He continued to act as a chivalrous man, eliminate violence, punish evil, and promote goodness. For the expression of good and bad beauty and ugly good and evil, martial arts films and Westerns are no different. When will people question the law? When the bad guy kills the good guy or when the bad guy succeeds, the law still has to protect the bad guy's rights. American law is absolutely good law not evil law, but it has never been able to mediate this paradox that makes people grit their teeth. Only in the world of martial arts films and westerns can the protagonist and the audience enjoy the pleasures and grievances that can only be achieved in this extrajudicial land. 50 years later, Democrats still continue this regrettable legal policy of "bow down" to the bad guys, which further reflects the meaning of the film's torture of moral justice and law.