Extended Reading
  • Grayce 2022-04-20 09:01:47

    [Netflix] I personally support the diversity of the cast, but diversity cannot be a fig leaf for weak stories and uninteresting acting.

  • Marcellus 2022-04-22 07:01:32

    ! She opened it with the expectation of complaining about Mary Su, and unexpectedly went up. In the background of the regency, the focus of the narrative is the female gaze and the female experience. The sex scenes of the male and female protagonists are all based on the female protagonist's exploration, understanding and enjoyment of her own sexuality, which has a certain modernity. Although the design is a bit... American... The dance party is still beautiful, some scenes are even quite Austin, and the tension between the male and female protagonists is also very good. Compared with some straight male narratives that use the theme of feminism but are very male gazey, on the contrary, although this play is set in an era when women lack choice and freedom, the narrative often stands on the female standpoint, and also creates a group of vivid, There are characters with growth arcs (but the female lead raped the male lead in marriage!! The last few episodes are so ruined). While the cast is still colorist, constructing an alternate history that allows non-white and mixed-race actors to play period dramas in nice little dresses is good. They keep "respecting history", so black actors can only play slaves? Ever been oppressed and never deserved to be the protagonist? It's pathetic for people who jump at the sight of black people.

Related articles